On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Rob O'Connor <robocon@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
Tim Little wrote:

Knapp wrote:
> I always wonder just how diverse humans would be after a dark night of say 1000 years.

I agree with Bruce Johnson - without intervention 1000 years isn't long enough. 50-60 human generations with pessimistic mutation rates far in excess of the ~70 per generation average[1] won't cut it.


With regard to the beginning of this thread - the only way I can reconcile the concept of a carbon-silicone biochemical transition is something like this:

Some rare worlds have two biochemistries develop in parallel, rather than one type filling all available niches early in a world's history.

So the silicone-based life interacts sporadically with the carbon-based stuff e.g. silicone stuff is based underground, and quakes or volcanism allow contact with surface or ocean dwelling carbon-based life.

The real evolutionary action is evident at the level of micro-organisms - both in diversity and speed.

Multicellular life forms either develop symbiotic relationships, or die off from crippling autoimmune complications as a host tries to eject an intruder...


Rob O'Connor
[1]http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22345605

Not to sure if Rob or Tim wrote this.
How many generations did it take to turn a wolf into a chiwawa?
 

--
Douglas E Knapp

Creative Commons Film Group, Helping people make open source movies
with open source software!
http://douglas.bespin.org/CommonsFilmGroup/phpBB3/index.php

Massage in Gelsenkirchen-Buer:
http://douglas.bespin.org/tcm/ztab1.htm
Please link to me and trade links with me!

Open Source Sci-Fi mmoRPG Game project.
http://sf-journey-creations.wikispot.org/Front_Page
http://code.google.com/p/perspectiveproject/