On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Rupert Boleyn <rupert.boleyn@gmail.com> wrote:
On 20/06/2014 07:42, Kurt Feltenberger wrote:
On 6/19/2014 3:32 PM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) wrote:
Hadn't read that, thanks for the info.

So, in the end, we're back to the old axiom that there's no precaution
that a dedicated human being can't bypass!

Pretty much so.  In the end, it was a training and doctrine issue; the
doctrine focused on firing as fast as possible as opposed to accuracy
and then ignoring the safety training that they had all been trained to
follow.

Given director control and automated firing (to allow for the ship's roll), highest loading speed possible would have a negligible effect on accuracy ('merely' on safety).

I suspect that blocking open the doors and hatches might also have been a consequence of insufficient manpower. Following the proscribed safety rules with small loading crew (one too small to delegate someone to stand by each door and hatch, to open/close it in a timely manner) would have certainly impacted rate of fire.

And . . . I just have to say this . . . weren't the French picked on by the British, for regarding high speed [sufficient to dodge - e.g. run away from - incoming rounds] as equivalent to heavy armor? :P


--
Richard Aiken

"Never insult anyone by accident."  Robert A. Heinlein
"A word to the wise ain't necessary -- it's the stupid ones that need the advice." - Bill Cosby
"We know a little about a lot of things; just enough to make us dangerous." Dean Winchester