Re: The Monocyclelives
David Shayne
(11 Apr 2014 00:35 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Re: The Monocyclelives
greg@xxxxxx
(11 Apr 2014 00:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Re: The Monocyclelives
Knapp
(11 Apr 2014 06:03 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Re: The Monocyclelives
Postmark
(11 Apr 2014 11:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] The Monocyclelives Bruce Johnson (11 Apr 2014 16:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] The Monocyclelives
Bruce Johnson
(11 Apr 2014 15:58 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] The Monocyclelives Bruce Johnson 11 Apr 2014 16:00 UTC
On Apr 11, 2014, at 12:35 AM, Postmark <xxxxxx@btinternet.com> wrote: > On 11 Apr 2014, at 07:03, Knapp <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 2:57 AM, <xxxxxx@nokes.name> wrote: >> Vroom? >> >> They go 10mph. >> >> Not really vroom worthy. >> >> That was the case with some E-bikes too but now the have E-bikes that can, "break the law", with a flip of a switch. I can't see the monbike being different in its evolution. > > Back in the dawn of the 3I, we had a 16g sub-orbital pogo stick*, so I don't see late 3I VROOM gangs being limited to walking pace...limited by the sound barrier and the ability to hang on, more like. > > *ok, I know that the designer claimed the pogo stick was capable of orbit, but that's not how you use a pogo stick - it's meant to come down as well as go up. I forgot the pogo stick. IIRC that was one of Rod Elliot’s mad envelope-vaporizing designs, wasn’t it? -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs