QREBS
Timothy Collinson
(23 May 2014 16:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] QREBS
Kurt Feltenberger
(23 May 2014 16:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] QREBS
Timothy Collinson
(24 May 2014 06:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] QREBS
Jeffrey Schwartz
(23 May 2014 17:43 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] QREBS
Timothy Collinson
(24 May 2014 07:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] QREBS Postmark (24 May 2014 00:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] QREBS
Timothy Collinson
(24 May 2014 07:40 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] QREBS
Postmark
(24 May 2014 09:32 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] QREBS
Timothy Collinson
(24 May 2014 13:02 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] QREBS
Postmark
(24 May 2014 21:55 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] QREBS Postmark 24 May 2014 00:17 UTC
On 23 May 2014, at 17:31, Timothy Collinson <xxxxxx@port.ac.uk> wrote: > Thoughts? (have I done my math right?) I don't agree with just adding the percentages together and then multiplying, instead try multiplying each percentage in turn so that it becomes progressively more expensive to make things better and harder to make things cheaper. Also the price ranges won't be big enough - I looked up the price range for a Ford Ka vs a Ford Mondeo and it is nearly 4x between the cheapest Ka and the most expensive Mondeo. That doesn't consider different manufacturers and a top end Mondeo isn't that much more capable than a bottom end Ka. +10% might just give you a better in car entertainment system and perhaps nicer seats. Phil Kitching