|
DMARC
shadow@xxxxxx
(01 Sep 2014 16:12 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] DMARC
Carlos
(01 Sep 2014 17:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] DMARC
Phil Pugliese
(01 Sep 2014 23:30 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] DMARC
Grimmund
(02 Sep 2014 00:46 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] DMARC
shadow@xxxxxx
(04 Sep 2014 09:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] DMARC
Greg Chalik
(02 Sep 2014 01:27 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] DMARC
Phil Pugliese
(02 Sep 2014 14:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] DMARC
shadow@xxxxxx
(04 Sep 2014 09:09 UTC)
|
|
Re: [TML] DMARC shadow@xxxxxx (03 Sep 2014 11:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] DMARC shadow@xxxxxx 03 Sep 2014 11:26 UTC
On 1 Sep 2014 at 9:12, shadow@shadowgard.com wrote: > Gmail implemented DMARC a few days ago. > > Unlike Yahoo, they set it up to *not* send bounce messages back to > the list owner. > > So the foirst I knew was when some folks on a list I run told me > about it. That and the drop in traffic. > > So, I figure the TML may need to add those stupid headers for gmail > users too. False alarm. Apparently a msjor silence on my list co-incided with gmail doing whatever they did. -- Leonard Erickson (aka shadow) shadow at shadowgard dot com