CT LBB 'Mercenary' 1st ed vs 2nd ed??? Phil Pugliese (03 Mar 2015 16:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 'Mercenary' 1st ed vs 2nd ed??? Leslie Bates (03 Mar 2015 16:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 'Mercenary' 1st ed vs 2nd ed??? Phil Pugliese (03 Mar 2015 17:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 'Mercenary' 1st ed vs 2nd ed??? Bruce Johnson (03 Mar 2015 18:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 'Mercenary' 1st ed vs 2nd ed??? tmr0195@xxxxxx (03 Mar 2015 22:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] CT LBB 'Mercenary' 1st ed vs 2nd ed??? Fred Kiesche (06 Mar 2015 14:32 UTC)

Re: [TML] CT LBB 'Mercenary' 1st ed vs 2nd ed??? Bruce Johnson 03 Mar 2015 18:04 UTC

my Classic CT CD contains only one ‘Mercenary' pdf.

Other books that had significant edition changes have both books in the collection: Books 1-3 are present in the 1977 and 1981 editions and both High Guard editions are present. in the html list of book on the disk the 1977 edition of books 1-3 and the first ed book 5 are listed as ‘obsolete’.

The ‘Mercenary’ in the collection is copywritten 1978.

> On Mar 3, 2015, at 10:23 AM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote:
>
> This email was sent from yahoo.com which does not allow forwarding of emails via email lists. Therefore the sender's email address (xxxxxx@yahoo.com) has been replaced with a dummy one. The original message follows:
>
> ==============================================================================
>
> I've seen the 1981 printing of 'Mercenary' referred to as "the 2nd edition" so I just wondered...

--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs