Fixing the Third Imperium -- A series of utterly immodest proposals
Douglas Berry
(12 Jun 2016 22:01 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fixing the Third Imperium -- A series of utterly immodest proposals
Richard Aiken
(12 Jun 2016 23:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fixing the Third Imperium -- A series of utterly immodest proposals
Richard Aiken
(13 Jun 2016 03:22 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fixing the Third Imperium -- A series of utterly immodest proposals
Douglas Berry
(13 Jun 2016 05:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fixing the Third Imperium -- A series of utterly immodest proposals Karsten Gorn (14 Jun 2016 11:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Fixing the Third Imperium -- A series of utterly immodest proposals Karsten Gorn 14 Jun 2016 11:33 UTC
* Douglas Berry <dberry49xxxxxx@gmail.com> [160613 09:20]: > 11,000 worlds, the vast majority self ruling is the quick answer. Ruled by > an Emperor and his loyal nobles. But most of the nobles seem to have no > real power over these independent worlds. So what gives? IMTU a noble title is linked with large percentage of shares of one or more of the Megacorps. IMTO it follows both the region and the several corporation and also the chain of loyalty. So a Duke is able to give out shares for the megacorporation within his domain. He can give one noble eg. a majority of shares for controlling LSP on one subsector and another one a mayor share of Imperial Arms. Thus control is divided among several nobles, who also then compete for economical superioty. The idea behind that, that IMTU the Empire should not be only a set of services provided for the memberworlds but also a pan civilization. For the later, it needs a set of cultaral bonds, which the megacorporations are providing. Yours sincerely, Karsten Gorn -- All Hail The Winslow! He is everywhere! Instantmessenger: Jabber: xxxxxx@jabber.ccc.de or ICQ: 95492828 PGP-Fingerprint: 4BEF 23EA 02AE BACA 9918 31FF 285B 0426 0E1A B2FC ----------------- > encrypted E-Mail preferred <------------------------