Ping
John Geoffrey
(17 Nov 2016 17:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping
tmr0195@xxxxxx
(17 Nov 2016 17:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping
Graham Donald
(18 Nov 2016 00:56 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping
David Shaw
(18 Nov 2016 07:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping shadow@xxxxxx (19 Nov 2016 01:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping
shadow@xxxxxx
(19 Nov 2016 01:00 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping
Bruce Johnson
(19 Nov 2016 02:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping
Kurt Feltenberger
(19 Nov 2016 02:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping
Tim
(19 Nov 2016 08:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping
Jeffrey Schwartz
(19 Nov 2016 15:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Ping shadow@xxxxxx 19 Nov 2016 00:59 UTC
On 18 Nov 2016 at 7:31, David Shaw wrote: > All of mine at the moment are from ladies of negotiable affection. > Apparently, there are *thousands* of women in my area looking for > secret trysts with someone other than their partner which, given where > I live, means pretty much *every* woman, which I do find a little hard > to believe and leads me to think that some of these e-mails might be > less than genuine. David Shaw Well, if the ones I used to get were true, I'd have a quadrupleH chest and the contents of my pants would scare a horse... ObTrav: the PCs find out *why* that shipment of "enhancement products" was so cheap. Seems that pills from two different lines got mixed together. So *something* will get bigger, but what can change from pill to pill in the same bottle. -- Leonard Erickson (aka shadow) shadow at shadowgard dot com