It's a BIG one! Phil Pugliese (13 Apr 2017 18:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Kurt Feltenberger (13 Apr 2017 19:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Postmark (14 Apr 2017 22:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Rupert Boleyn (14 Apr 2017 22:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Bruce Johnson (14 Apr 2017 23:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Charles Brogdon (14 Apr 2017 23:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Bruce Johnson (14 Apr 2017 23:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Rupert Boleyn (15 Apr 2017 00:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Michael Houghton (14 Apr 2017 23:50 UTC)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Richard Aiken (19 Apr 2017 00:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Rupert Boleyn (19 Apr 2017 00:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Richard Aiken (19 Apr 2017 01:13 UTC)

Re: [TML] It's a BIG one! Michael Houghton 14 Apr 2017 23:50 UTC

Howdy!

On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Postmark
<xxxxxx@btinternet.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:59 PM -0400, "Phil Pugliese (via tml list)"
> <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote:
>
>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> [I'd sure like to see the before & after photo recon!]
>>
>> FYI;
>>
>> US drops largest non-nuclear bomb in Afghanistan
>>
>> (RNN) - The U.S Air Force dropped a MOAB bomb in the Nangahar Province in
>> Afghanistan on a suspected ISIS target, military officials told CNN.
>> The bomb was dropped on a target in the Nangahar Province of Afghanistan,
>> near its border with Pakistan.
>> Called "the mother of all bombs," the GBU-43/B Massive Ordnance Air Blast
>> is a large-yield conventional bomb.
>> The MOAB is 30 feet long and weight 21,000 pounds. It detonates about six
>> feet off the ground, maximizing the range of its destructive power.
>> It leaves a blast radius of a mile in each direction.
>> This is apparently the first time the bomb has been used in combat, though
>> it has been tested in various places, including at Eglin Air Force Base, FL.
>>
>> Copyright 2017 Raycom News Network. All rights reserved.
>
> I'm left wondering why the USAF designed and built such pointless bomb.
>
> If the target is on top of the ground, a number of smaller bombs would do
> the job.
>
> If the target is underground, one of Barnes Wallis's 10ton Grand Slam
> "Earthquake" bombs detonating 10's of metres underground would be more
> effective.
>
> I mean, it's not as if we didn't let you play with a couple in 1946.
>
> ;-)
>
As I understand it, this bomb is designed to generate one monstrous shock
wave/overpressure wave. The idea here was to get the blast wave deep into
caves and tunnels.

yours,
Michael

--
Michael Houghton   | Herveus d'Ormonde
xxxxxx@gmail.com         | White Wolf and the Phoenix
Lanham, MD, USA            | Tablet and Inkle bands, and other stuff
                          | http://whitewolfandphoenix.com