Subject:

RE: [SERIALST] Man-hour vs. staff (Was cease claiming, checking in, binding--7 messages)

From:

"O'Brien, Pamela" <Pamela.O'Brien@STJUDE.ORG>

Date:

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:49:33 -0600

 

This is exactly the kind of thing men would not digress into arguing about, which is kind of ironic, isn’t it?

 

 

Pamela L. O'Brien

Library Assistant

Biomedical Library

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

901-595-3389

_________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Subject:

Re: [SERIALST] Man-hour vs. staff (Was cease claiming, checking in, binding--7 messages)

From:

Ian Woodward <iwoodward@colgate.edu>

Date:

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:52:35 -0500

 

 

Here is a biblical scholar on the subject of pronouns, &c. 

 

http://wf-f.org/MankoSilk.html

 

That aside, "man-hours" is a unit measure of labor, rather like "board-feet" is a measure of timber.  It is conventional, rather like abbreviating pounds as "lbs."  IW

 

__________________________________________________________________________________

 

Subject:

RE: [SERIALST] Man-hour vs. staff (Was cease claiming, checking in, binding--7 messages)

From:

"Chris Ryan" <Chris-Ryan@utc.edu>

Date:

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:57:09 -0500

 

 

She’s right –this is a commonly accepted accounting term.  If you all disagree so strongly about this and other words, use your employer’s time *off-list* to find the appropriate forum to wage this war.  I personally don’t have time to sift through these discussions on a professional list about librarianship and am pretty sure I’m not alone. 

 

Chris

 

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> 

Christine E. Ryan

UC Foundation Associate Professor &

Electronic Resources Librarian

University of Tennessee at Chattanooga

voice:  423-425-4470

email: chris-ryan@utc.edu

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><> 

This correspondence should be considered public record and subject to public inspection pursuant to the Tennessee Public Records Act.

 

___________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

Subject:

RE: [SERIALST] Man-hour vs. staff (Was cease claiming, checking in, binding--7 messages)

From:

"Stokes, Judith" <JStokes@ric.edu>

Date:

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:06:14 -0500

 

“Ladies?” Presumably, you meant 3c below “ladies and gentlemen.” But perhaps you assumed that none of the gentlemen on the list have opinions on semantics or library jargon?

 

Main Entry: la·dy

Pronunciation: \ˈlā-dē\

Function: noun

Inflected Form(s): plural ladies

Usage: often attributive

Etymology: Middle English, from Old English hlǣfdige, from hlāf bread + -dige (akin to ̄ge kneader of bread) — more at loaf, dairy

Date: before 12th century

1 a : a woman having proprietary rights or authority especially as a feudal superior b : a woman receiving the homage or devotion of a knight or lover
2 capitalized : virgin mary —usually used with Our
3 a : a woman of superior social position b : a woman of refinement and gentle manners c : woman, female —often used in a courteous reference <show the lady to a seat> or usually in the plural in address <ladies and gentlemen>
4 a : wife b : girlfriend, mistress
5 a : any of various titled women in Great Britain —used as the customary title of (1) a marchioness, countess, viscountess, or baroness or (2) the wife of a knight, baronet, member of the peerage, or one having the courtesy title of lord and used as a courtesy title for the daughter of a duke, marquess, or earl b : a woman who is a member of an order of knighthood — compare dame

It is a commonly accepted practice of the library profession to use a dictionary.

Judith

Judith E. Stokes

Electronic resources/Serials Librarian

Rhode Island College

600 Mount Pleasant Avenue

Providence, RI 02908-1991

401.456.8165