I spent quite a bit of time last year looking at our print periodicals titles in advance of our annual renewal.  One important thing that I did was to reach out to each academic department head with a list of the titles in their discipline that we subscribed to in print (we’re a small library and aren’t field-specialists the way those professors are).  We asked those individuals (deans, school chairs, etc.) to review those titles with their faculty and let us know what titles we needed to keep (for curricular/accreditation support, student/faculty research, etc), what ones we could switch to online (if available and cost-effective), which journals we could drop completely, and any they wanted us to add if possible.  We ended up being able to drop quite a few print titles, either because they were no longer needed by faculty and students, because the content was now open-access, or else we could get full online vendor access for the same price or cheaper.  We did have one department where we could have saved hundreds of dollars by going online for a number of titles, but the faculty insisted “print” instead.  We’ll be revisiting this issue in the future, especially as tight budgets will a reality for quite some time, as will title price increases.  We do have administrative support to override faculty format preferences in the interests of the financial bottom line, but as last year was the first time we’d done this kind of faculty review, we opted to proceed carefully and ease into things.

 

 

Julianne Newberry, MLS

Technical Services Assistant

Office: (913) 971-3563

_______________________________

 

MidAmerica Nazarene University

2030 E. College Way

Olathe, KS 66062

www.mnu.edu

 

Pioneering Spirit | Passion to Serve | Purposeful Lives

 

This message and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity identified above in the e-mail address(es). If you are not the addressee, be aware that any review, disclosure, or use of the contents of this message and/or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please destroy it immediately and notify me at (913) 971-3563.

 

From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of Melissa Belvadi
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 11:58 AM
To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] subscription review/cancellation exercise - the 3 scenarios

 

This brings up an interesting issue. In the budget climate many of us face, we just don't have the resources to purchase a serial in multiple formats. In the case you described of the prof who "insisted" you keep buying all three formats, I'm pretty sure we'd have been able to reject that "request" and have our VP-Academic fully support us. We're at the point where if we can get the same content cheaper by changing to online-only, we do it without consultation, and we're prepared to fight any faculty, no matter how senior, on that issue, and, again, I fully expect to win because in tight budget times, no one who matters when it comes to budget issues will brook that kind of idiosyncratic nonsense around here.  

 

In fact, a few times I've had to fully cancel what might have been considered "core" titles (or drop down to relying on embargoed "free" access), faculty protests have backed down in the face of hard usage data with no blowback after a bit of grumbling. The only ongoing grumbling we still face is from our well-publicized decision to cancel Web of Science after an exorbitant price increase.

 

Do many of you still work in a climate of irrational preference overriding budget concerns, and if so, have you tested your higher admin support lately?

 

Melissa

 

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Diane Westerfield <Diane.Westerfield@coloradocollege.edu> wrote:

Just wanted to throw in that you should check for notes in the records about who originally requested/selected the journal, and was it for a specific department or professor. This may determine whether you might have some blowback if you cancel a journal that turns out to be the favorite of an active professor.  We use Innovative Millennium as our ILS; there are often notes in the order and/or checkin records regarding this information.

 

Our school is small enough that it’s pretty easy to talk to other librarians and find out what may cause contention. Also figure out which professor is long gone, and nobody else does research or teaching in XYZ area, so XYZ journal is almost never used and is pretty safe to cancel. If you’re a larger school it may be more of formal project.

 

You can also talk to any old-timers about historical blowups. Then do some investigation to see if the blower-uppers are still around. Has their attitude changed? For example, we had a professor who demanded we keep a certain journal in all 3 formats (online, print, and microform). That was maybe 10 years ago. The person is now retired and seems to appreciate the online access a lot more, and is less wedded to print. If we could gin up the funds to buy the archives, we might be able to cancel the print (and withdraw all the bound volumes) without too much bad reaction.

 

Of course, you are probably going to have to cancel some “potential blowup” titles, but you can identify proactively what might cause problems and figure out politic approaches to communication. (and let the faculty know that budget problems are forcing your hand.)

 

Diane Westerfield, Electronic Resources & Serials Librarian

Tutt Library, Colorado College

diane.westerfield@coloradocollege.edu

(719) 389-6661

(719) 389-6082 (fax)

 

 

 

 

From: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG] On Behalf Of Caroline Dean
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 6:40 AM
To: SERIALST@LISTSERV.NASIG.ORG
Subject: [SERIALST] subscription review/cancellation exercise - the 3 scenarios

 

 

***Cross-posted to multiple lists; please excuse duplication.***

 

Dear colleagues

 

The subscriptions (e-journals, p-journals, databases) budget at the University of Cape Town Libraries is facing a budget cut. Our finance department has asked us to draw up scenarios on what the impact to the university will be if the subscriptions budget is cut by 5, 10 and 15%?

 

Have you undertaken such an exercise recently? Or even a straight-forward review/cancellation exercise? What are some of the criteria you used to evaluate titles for retention or cancellation?

 

Thank you

 

Regards

Caroline

 

 

 

Caroline Dean

Acquisitions Manager

University of Cape Town Libraries,

Private Bag X3, Rondebosch, 7701, South Africa.

 

Tel: +27 21 6503701

Fax: +27 21 6502044

Email: caroline.dean@uct.ac.za

 

 

 


UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN

This e-mail is subject to the UCT ICT policies and e-mail disclaimer published on our website at http://www.uct.ac.za/about/policies/emaildisclaimer/ or obtainable from +27 21 650 9111. This e-mail is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. If the e-mail has reached you in error, please notify the author. If you are not the intended recipient of the e-mail you may not use, disclose, copy, redirect or print the content. If this e-mail is not related to the business of UCT it is sent by the sender in the sender's individual capacity.

 


To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1

 


To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1



 

--

Melissa Belvadi

Collections Librarian

University of Prince Edward Island

mbelvadi@upei.ca 902-566-0581

 

 

 


To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1



To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1