I would echo Scott’s advice. Every library has a different approach.

 

My department compiles cost and usage reports for all subject areas, from as many publishers as possible, and that report gets reviewed by subject specialists. If there is a perpetual, IP authenticated, online version available, that format change gets made automatically. Otherwise, the subject specialists have primarily (practically final) authority to cancel and add. Adds must be cost neutral, though.

 

Cres Dept enters changes into the agent’s renewal system at the end of the process. We rely on accurate information at the agent for many of our renewal decisions.

 

Let us know if you have more questions.

 

Christina Torbert

Head of Continuing Resources and Acquisitions

Bibliographer for Philosophy and Religion

Associate Professor

J.D. Williams Library

University of Mississippi

P.O. Box 1848

University, MS 38677-1848

U.S.A.

O: +1-662-915-7059 | F: +1-662-915-6744

ctorbert@olemiss.edu

 

 

 

Kathryn,

This is somewhat of a complicated question. I would refer you to conference presentations and journal articles about these topics.

 

We decide we gets renewed or cancelled by groups of subject librarians reviewing usage, cost per use, core title applicability, and availability of pay-per-view.

Yes, we review usage reports, both for electronic and print. Please explore “unique” in COUNTER 5.

Subject librarians are primarily responsible; however, they do consult with faculty.

 

The final decision is made by acquisitions subject to a final, final decision by administration.

 

Scott Pope

Continuing Resources Librarian

Texas State University

 

 

 

To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1

 

To unsubscribe from the SERIALST list, click the following link:
http://listserv.nasig.org/scripts/wa-NASIG.exe?SUBED1=SERIALST&A=1