Re: Serials Librarian (2 messages) ERCELAA@ctrvax.Vanderbilt.Edu 12 Jul 2001 18:14 UTC
2 messages: 1)_____ Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:43:49 -0500 From: "Edelen, Joe" <jedelen@USD.EDU> Subject: Re: Serials Librarian (Carol Feustel) Haven't followed all the discussion about Haworth journals, but have worked in this field long enough to have at least 3 observations about them which I believe would stand the test of time: 1) their journals are not regularly published on a regular schedule 2) they are not very user friendly with claims or to claimants 3) they frequently combine issues so that instead of paying for a quarterly or other frequency, you get fewer issues published on erratic schedules with no reduction in price for the lack of promised issues or timely production. In my opinion what Carol says about claims is absolutely true and the extra work for the publisher and then the bad image they get there from. Joe Edelen University of South Dakota ___ Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:47:38 -0400 From: "Feustel, Carol (FEUSTECS)" <FEUSTECS@UCMAIL.UC.EDU> Subject: Re: Serials Librarian To Mark and others that are questioning the publication pattern of Serials Librarian: Look at the other Haworth journals your library receives. They're all that way. Four issues per volume does NOT equal four issues per year at their company. They may publish all four issues in one year, or it may take them YEARS to publish all four issues. They may publish two volumes in one year. They may wait two years between volumes. Their ridiculous "schedule" is nothing new. For instance, I haven't received any issues of Journal of Geriatric Drug Therapy for over a year. After 5 claims I was finally advised that the title is changing and the "issues will be forthcoming." Mr. Cohen, if you could move the company into the real world of truthful publication schedules with ALL of your journals you would eliminate the majority of the claims you currently receive. We never know when the issues are being published, therefore we claim 'just in case.' **One volume with four issues normally equals an issue published quarterly-every 90 days.** Adding in an extra unannounced volume is not appreciated because we have ever-tightening budgets. Your company publishes lovely journals, they just need to abide by real schedules. Sincerely, Carol Feustel ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Carol S. Feustel phone: 513-558-0179 Serials Specialist fax: 513-558-1709 Health Sciences Library email: carol.feustel@uc.edu University of Cincinnati MSB R101 Box 670574 231 Albert Sabin Way Cincinnati, OH 45267-0574 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2)____ Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:12:02 -0700 From: Dan Lester <dan@riverofdata.com> Subject: Re: Serials Librarian (Carol Feustel) Thanks to all for providing examples that illustrate the issues I raised months ago (and I'm sure others have as well). I received off-list replies from a couple of Haworth folks, but didn't have the time to do the research that has been provided here by others. In addition, some of the "double issues" are no thicker than a regular issue. I'm not interested just in "number of pages", but it is a factor. Content quality is highly variable, at least in the library science related journals I see. I can't comment on how "lovely" any of the health science journals are, but the library-related ones rarely fit that description. Just for fun I checked the website http://www.haworthpressinc.com/ and found this typically strange information on Journal of Bisexuality: "Current Volume: Volume 2, No. 1Spring 2001. Volume 3, No. 1Spring 2002. Quarterly (4 issues per volume)." I'll be interested to hear how that translates to four issues to volume. Another featured journal is the Journal of Electronic Resources, which has a price and a purported publication schedule. Of course it doesn't yet have an editor or any issues published. Wonder why I'm not ready to send off a personal or library subscription? Another pet peeve is the pages of padding of ads for other Haworth journals and publications, plus the bound in cards. My biggest irritation with Haworth publications is the continual attempt to sell you the same thing twice. Each issue is also marketed as a "monograph", and if the acquisitions searchers aren't very careful (fortunately, ours are very good, indeed), you'll end up with a pricey "book" that duplicates one of your journal issues. cheers dan -- Dan Lester, Data Wrangler dan@RiverOfData.com 3577 East Pecan, Boise, Idaho 83716-7115 USA www.riverofdata.com www.gailndan.com Stop Global Whining!