Publishers refusing to deal with a jobber (3 messages) Marcia Tuttle 22 May 2003 20:26 UTC
-original message - Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 16:38:13 -0500 From: Dustin Larmore <dustin.larmore@dsu.edu> Subject: Publishers refusing to deal with a jobber We recently received notice that a publisher for one of our journals (Gifted Child Quarterly) will no longer accept orders through a vendor (e.g., EBSCO). We will have to order directly from the publisher. I assume that this change results from the divine/RoweCom mess. Has anyone else experienced this situation with other publishers? Is this change of policy a developing trend? I certainly hope not. We are already swamped with work as it is without having to order all serial titles individually. Dustin Larmore (dustin.larmore@dsu.edu) Instructor and Technical Services Librarian Karl E. Mundt Library Dakota State University Madison, SD 57042-1799 Office: (605) 256-5204 FAX: (605) 256-5208 http://www.homepages.dsu.edu/larmore ----------1 Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 08:49:25 -0400 From: Dianne Oster <osterdia@shu.edu> Subject: Re: Publishers refusing to deal with a jobber (Dustin Larmore) I have found this happen from time to time, that certain publishers will tell the jobber that the client must order direct, but I don't think it's a trend. At this point, its too soon to tell if this is a result of the divine/Faxon mess. I don't know who publishes that particular title, but it could just be an internal decision that makes things easier on their end to deal directly with subscribers, rather than having a third party involved. Even though it is more work for you, in some cases it is much better in terms of customer service to deal directly with the publisher. This is just my humble opinion. Dianne E. Oster Serials Librarian Seton Hall Law Library One Newark Center Newark, NJ 07102 973-642-8195 ----------2 Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 08:59:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Barbara Eastland - Library <eastland@hal.muhlberg.edu> Subject: Re: Publishers refusing to deal with a jobber (Dustin Larmore) Over the years we have had several publishers refuse to deal with a jobber. The reasons varied, but the end result was the same: order directly or do without the journal. I don't believe that this is a trend; I believe that it's the publisher's wish to eliminate, perhaps, the jobber's percentage in an already tight economy. Best regards, Barb Barbara B. Eastland VOICE: 484-664-3561 Serials Manager FAX: 484-664-3511 Trexler Library eastland@hal.muhlberg.edu Muhlenberg College 2400 Chew St. Allentown PA 18104 ----------3 Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 09:00:14 -0400 From: Elaine Donnelly <edonnell@ngs.org> Subject: Re: SERIALST Digest - 20 May 2003 to 21 May 2003 (#2003-94) Dear Karl, We have recently been notified by the publishers of Smithsonian, Washingtonian, and Audubon that they will not accept our vendor's order. Last summer, Sierra did the same thing (and it was a different vendor). We can't tell if this is because of who the vendor is (we recently switched to a smaller company that specializes in corporate libraries), or because the publishers are non-profits that got burned in the divine/Rowecom bankruptcy (but Washingtonian doesn't fit into that group). I'll be interested to hear what other libraries say. I'm on the digest, so I'll have to "tune in tomorrow". Hope this info helps, Elaine Donnelly, Librarian/Technical Services National Geographic Society, Libraries & Information Services 1145 17th Street NW, Washington DC 20036-4688 202-857-7794 voice ; 202-429-5731 fax edonnell@ngs.org