Re: FW: [SERIALST] New Statesman - Numbering Problem Koveleskie, Judith 01 Feb 2005 15:57 UTC
Lynne and others, What Lynne lists below is also what I have and there are not any missing issues. For some reason they have skipped 4723 and the issue for January 24 is 4724. I don't know why the publisher thinks the numbering is wrong, but they do and have made this adjustment. Judith A. Koveleskie Periodicals Librarian Seton Hill University Reeves Memorial Library Greensburg, PA 15601 724-838-7828 This document may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you received it in error, please contact the sender at once and destroy the document. The document may contain information subject to restrictions of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Acts. Such information may not be disclosed or used in any fashion outside the scope of the service for which you are receiving the information. -----Original Message----- From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU]On Behalf Of Lynne Weaver Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 9:02 AM To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU Subject: [SERIALST] FW: [SERIALST] New Statesman - Numbering Problem My issues were tracking just fine, so I was muddling along very well until I got the list message! I have received: Dec 13 4718 Jan 1 4719/4720 Jan 10 4721 Jan 17 4722 Why, then, is "Jan 10th actually 4722 and January 17th ... 4723"? What issue am I missing that was supposed to be 4721? Yours, confused, Lynne N. Weaver Serials Coordinator Lipscomb Library Randolph-Macon Woman's College 2500 Rivermont Avenue Lynchburg, VA 24503 434 947-8396 434 947-8134 (FAX) lweaver@rmwc.edu -----Original Message----- From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU]On Behalf Of Koveleskie, Judith Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 3:09 PM To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU Subject: [SERIALST] New Statesman - Numbering Problem I thought others would like to know the response that came from the publisher regarding the numbering of this title. Judith A. Koveleskie Periodicals Librarian Seton Hill University Reeves Memorial Library Greensburg, PA 15601 724-838-7828 This document may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you received it in error, please contact the sender at once and destroy the document. The document may contain information subject to restrictions of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Acts. Such information may not be disclosed or used in any fashion outside the scope of the service for which you are receiving the information. THEIR RESPONSE: The publisher had a problem with their numering which was to be corrected with the Jan 24th issue. If you have the 1/17 you should not be missing anything. Below is some information I received from the publisher a couple weeks ago. Thanks- Carissa Unfortunately, despite my instructions the numbering of the double issues was done incorrectly and this hasn't been rectified for the start of 2005 - sooooooooo........Jan 10th is actually 4722 and January 17th should be 4723. The sequence will be corrected for next week so Jan 24th will be 4724. best wishes, stephen MY INQUIRY: The January 24, 2005 issue of New Statesman is predicted as Vol. 134, No. 4723 (New Statesman & Society Vol. 18, no. 842 is the alternate numbering. However, the issue itself is numbered Vol. 134, No. 4724 (New Statesman & Society Vol. 18, no. 843). I don't think we missed an issue because we have January 17. Things like this drive librarians crazy.