Re: rate of switch from print to online only Wheeler, Don 08 Mar 2006 20:23 UTC
I find it amusing (and typical) that commercial publishers acknowledge "that librarians also have issues about perpetual access". We are a research library. Our books (and many serials) date back hundreds of years and are still in the original format. No migration issues; No down time. The 'data' can be read with the naked eye. In Botany, taxonomic nomenclature is approved ONLY in print. It is critical to the science that access to the original description of the plant be available to researchers into the future. Plants described in publications going back one or two hundred years are still referenced today. The International Botanical Congress continues to discuss and vote on the acceptance of names described in online only versions, but have not agreed to do so, largely because of the lack of archival guarantee. Why is a rate of shift "disappointingly slow"? Perhaps because our confidence in the commercial publishing industry's investment in long-term archiving is lacking. This might be because we believe their vested interest is based on a profit margin rather than on cultural stewardship. Donald Wheeler Collection Development Librarian The LuEsther T. Mertz Library The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Blvd. Bronx, New York 10458 USA tel: (718) 817 8752 fax: (718) 817 8956 email: dwheeler@nybg.org http://www.nybg.org -----Original Message----- From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of Adam Marshall Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 11:46 AM To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU Subject: Re: [SERIALST] rate of switch from print to online only Following is the response I made to Steve's question off list but which he asked me to post. I am supplying the percentage of online-only institutional subscriptions for the journals published by Portland Press (i.e. life science/medical journals) between 2002 and 2006 (to date). The bulk of subscription orders are still for the print/online combined rate. 2002 - 0.7% 2003 - 3.08% 2004 - 7.63% 2005 - 12.5% 2006 (to date) - 15.73% We find the rate of shift to be disappointingly slow. For our field online is the primary version of the journals and our users (we are part of the Biochemical Society so we have feedback from our members as well as subscribers and readers) say that they no longer look at the print version of the journal. However this is not reflected in the pattern of change by the libraries who are the purchasers of the material. We have tried to accelerate the switch to online-only in recent years by increasing the price differential between print/online and online-only which is about 17% cheaper in 2006. We are quite proactive about telling subscribers about the saving they could make. However we assume that it is difficult to get libraries (or the subscription agents they use) to change their ordering patterns, and it may be that the price of our combined print/online subscription is still too attractive to switch. I accept that librarians also have issues about perpetual access. Incidentally I don't think that your institution subscribes to any of our journals so I assume that you may not be a science based institution. Patterns of change for non-science journals might be different, possibly slower. Regards Adam Marshall Director of Marketing and Customer Services Portland Press Commerce Way Colchester CO2 8HP, UK Tel: +44 (0)1206 796351 Fax: +44 (0)1206 799331 E-mail: adam.marshall@portlandpress.com www.portlandpress.com -----Original Message----- From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum [mailto:SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of STEVE BLACK@FACULTY@ACADEMICAFFAIRS Sent: 07 March 2006 19:57 To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU Subject: [SERIALST] rate of switch from print to online only A committee at my college is currently in the process of envisioning our library for the next 20 years. As part of this process, I'm working on projecting shelving needs for periodicals. I'll report 3 scenarios: 1. Needs if current print subscriptions are maintained for 20 years, 2. Cuts & weeding that would be necessary to maintain zero growth, 3. Shelving needs if subscriptions progressively move to online only. Scenario 3 is the most likely course of action, but estimating the rate of conversion to online only requires some crystal ball gazing. To that end, I'm interested in the best guesses of SERIASTers on two points: At what rate will your library cancel print subscriptions in lieu of online only access? What portion of your periodicals collection will still arrive in print in 2026? Please take it as a given that myriad uncertainties make the decisions very complex, so answers are speculative. Therefore answers of "it depends" shall be fined ten dollars, payable to the offender's favorite charity ;). Steve Black Reference, Serials, and Instruction Librarian The College of Saint Rose 392 Western Avenue Albany, NY 12203-1419 blacks@strose.edu (518)458-5494