Email list hosting service & mailing list manager


regarding vendor switching Irma Nicola 11 Jul 2006 14:46 UTC

We have worked with a single vendor for more than 8 yrs, but I don't
think that there any harm in looking at other vendors for information.

There's no way to know if there is something better out there unless
someone can make the comparison.

But it is a big deal to switch vendors, so the difference in service and
cost would have to be significant enough to justify the change.

I deal with over 1400 active titles since 1999 and one main vendor and
several direct publishers, and a couple of duplicate banks routinely.

Irma Harue Nicola
Serials Coordinator
Azusa Pacific University
PO Box 7000
Azusa, California 91702
626-815-6000 extension 5258

John 1:4
inicola@apu.edu
-----Original Message-----
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum
[mailto:SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of SERIALST automatic digest
system
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 8:00 PM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: SERIALST Digest - 7 Jul 2006 to 10 Jul 2006 (#2006-144)

There are 6 messages totalling 235 lines in this issue.

Topics of the day:

  1. changing vendors (3)
  2. Serials Review Committee
  3. volume number on 2006 GRAMOPHONE issues (2)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:    Sun, 9 Jul 2006 15:44:57 +0200
From:    Rachel <rachelb@MACAM.AC.IL>
Subject: changing vendors

Dear Librarians
What do other serial librarians think about frequently changing vendors.
Last year we transferred all our subscriptions to one vendor (130 =
journals). This year my boss insisted I get an estimate from another =
vendor to see who was cheaper and either play one off the other or to =
simply jump boat and change vendors again!.
What good reasons can I give her as to why this is not a good idea other
=
than items that never turn up or double issues. For her, the financial =
aspect is the only issue! . There is actually quite a substantial =
difference.I have insisted that she first negotiate with our present =
vendor which she has agreed to do.=20
Thanks for any insights

Rachel Ben-Eliezer
Serials Librarian and Interlibrary Loan Services=20
DAVID YELLIN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION LIBRARY
POB 3578
Jerusalem 91035
ISRAEL
Tel: 02-6558180
Fax: 02-6521548
E-Mail: rachelb@macam.ac.il

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:12:42 -0700
From:    Cynthia Hsieh <chsieh@PACIFIC.EDU>
Subject: Re: changing vendors

Dear Rachel:

when calculating costs vs. saving, it is very important to include the
labor cost, that is, the time staff members spend in changing the vendor
information, verifying titles switched, setting up payment
process....,etc.  Often time, you will find that it is not cost
effective to change vendors too often.

>>> rachelb@MACAM.AC.IL 07/09/06 6:44 AM >>>
Dear Librarians
What do other serial librarians think about frequently changing
vendors.
Last year we transferred all our subscriptions to one vendor (130
journals). This year my boss insisted I get an estimate from another
vendor to see who was cheaper and either play one off the other or to
simply jump boat and change vendors again!.
What good reasons can I give her as to why this is not a good idea
other than items that never turn up or double issues. For her, the
financial aspect is the only issue! . There is actually quite a
substantial difference.I have insisted that she first negotiate with our
present vendor which she has agreed to do.
Thanks for any insights

Rachel Ben-Eliezer
Serials Librarian and Interlibrary Loan Services
DAVID YELLIN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION LIBRARY
POB 3578
Jerusalem 91035
ISRAEL
Tel: 02-6558180
Fax: 02-6521548
E-Mail: rachelb@macam.ac.il

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:31:38 -0700
From:    Kasia Stasik <kasia@UCR.EDU>
Subject: Re: changing vendors

Hello Rachel,

Hands down I agree with the previous post.  You have to weight the cost
and
time you will spend on the switch.  Also such frequent vendor changes
may
confuse publishers.  If any of the vendor uses fulfillment houses it
will
more then likely create shipping problems.  I'd also advice to check how
reliable your proposed vendor is.  The one that you are using now may be
better and in the long run it will save you time because you will not
end up
with missing issues and order replacements.  These are the things I
would
consider.

Kasia Stasik
Serials and Continuations Unit Supervisor
University of California Riverside Library
Tel.  (951) 827-2322
Fax. (951) 827-3720

-----Original Message-----
From: SERIALST: Serials in Libraries Discussion Forum
[mailto:SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU] On Behalf Of Cynthia Hsieh
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 9:13 AM
To: SERIALST@LIST.UVM.EDU
Subject: Re: [SERIALST] changing vendors

Dear Rachel:

when calculating costs vs. saving, it is very important to include the
labor cost, that is, the time staff members spend in changing the vendor
information, verifying titles switched, setting up payment
process....,etc.  Often time, you will find that it is not cost
effective to change vendors too often.

>>> rachelb@MACAM.AC.IL 07/09/06 6:44 AM >>>
Dear Librarians
What do other serial librarians think about frequently changing
vendors.
Last year we transferred all our subscriptions to one vendor (130
journals). This year my boss insisted I get an estimate from another
vendor to see who was cheaper and either play one off the other or to
simply jump boat and change vendors again!.
What good reasons can I give her as to why this is not a good idea
other than items that never turn up or double issues. For her, the
financial aspect is the only issue! . There is actually quite a
substantial difference.I have insisted that she first negotiate with our
present vendor which she has agreed to do.
Thanks for any insights

Rachel Ben-Eliezer
Serials Librarian and Interlibrary Loan Services
DAVID YELLIN COLLEGE OF EDUCATION LIBRARY
POB 3578
Jerusalem 91035
ISRAEL
Tel: 02-6558180
Fax: 02-6521548
E-Mail: rachelb@macam.ac.il

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 10 Jul 2006 12:11:19 -0700
From:    Cynthia Hsieh <chsieh@PACIFIC.EDU>
Subject: Serials Review Committee

Dear Serials Librarians:

Our library is in the process of re-organization to expand  our
internal Serials Review committee's responsibilities to electronic
resources.

I wonder if any of you also have a standing serials review committee
and are willing to share your experience and/or documentation?

I am especially interested in the following:

The committee's charge
The committee's membership

And, how does this committee fit into the overall collection
development structure.

Your help is greatly appreciated.

Cynthia Hsieh

Cynthia Hsieh
Head of Technical Services/Assistant Professor
University Library
University of the Pacific
3601 Pacific Ave.
Stockton, CA 95211
Tel: 209-946-2571
chsieh@pacific.edu

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:44:02 -0400
From:    Marion Meilaender <Mmeilaender@ALBION.EDU>
Subject: volume number on 2006 GRAMOPHONE issues

It appears that GRAMOPHONE's 2006 issues for January through May are
incorrectly numbered volume 83, instead of volume 84.  The numbering on
the June, 2006, issue does switch to volume 84.   We have queried the
publisher regarding whether the volume number for the first five issues
of the year was a misprint but have not yet received a reply.  How have
others handled this sort of problem?

Marion Meilaender            Mmeilaender@albion.edu

Albion College Library
Periodicals Dept.
602 E. Cass St.
Albion, MI 49224
(517) 629-0499

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 10 Jul 2006 14:54:17 -0700
From:    Steven C Shadle <shadle@U.WASHINGTON.EDU>
Subject: Re: volume number on 2006 GRAMOPHONE issues

515    Issues for Jan.-May 2006 incorrectly numbered v. 83.

Steve Shadle/Serials Access Librarian  *****  shadle@u.washington.edu
University of Washington Libraries      ***     Phone: (206) 685-3983
Seattle, WA 98195-2900                   *        Fax: (206) 543-0854

On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Marion Meilaender wrote:

> It appears that GRAMOPHONE's 2006 issues for January through May are
> incorrectly numbered volume 83, instead of volume 84.  The numbering
on
> the June, 2006, issue does switch to volume 84.   We have queried the
> publisher regarding whether the volume number for the first five
issues
> of the year was a misprint but have not yet received a reply.  How
have
> others handled this sort of problem?
>
> Marion Meilaender            Mmeilaender@albion.edu
>
> Albion College Library
> Periodicals Dept.
> 602 E. Cass St.
> Albion, MI 49224
> (517) 629-0499
>

------------------------------

End of SERIALST Digest - 7 Jul 2006 to 10 Jul 2006 (#2006-144)
**************************************************************