Summary of responses to Open vs. Closed Periodical Stack Qu. Ann M. Tenglund 21 Jun 1991 14:39 UTC
Thank you to all who responded to our query about open vs. closed stacks for periodicals. We received eight very helpful responses, which are summarized below: 1. Do you have open or closed stacks? 7 responded "open" 1 responded that they do not have periodical stacks, but the serials are integrated with the books in the regular stacks 2. How many periodical assistants (student or otherwise) do you have to do shelving and maintenance? Most libraries rely on student assistants for this, with some additional time put in by regular staff during busy periods. Some comments from responses: Student help of 65 hours/week maintains 3,000 titles Students for periodicals shelve current issues, regular shelvers for the library take care of the bound volumes In Fall/Winter sessions, 35 hours/week of student help maintains 22,000 issues/month. During Spring/Summer sessions, 25 hours/week of student help is needed. 3. How do you handle current issues (are they shelved separately, or kept with their titles? 7 responded that current issues are shelved separately 1 responded that most are kept with their titles 4. If you have open stacks, have you noticed more missing issues with open stacks? Most respondents had never had closed stacks, so the comments referred only to their experiences with open stacks. One library reported that it was no more of a problem with open stacks than with closed. Another library said that theft was no major problem, and all of their issues are protected by security strips. 3 libraries felt that theft and damaged issues were a problem. In one library, the issues were not actually stolen, but rather left in different locations throughout the library, resulting in "temporarily" missing issues. Two libraries gave statistics: 2-3 replacements needed per month for unbound issues, or a loss of 24 to 36 issues per year from a collection of 6,000 titles. They almost never lose bound titles. Another library reported claiming 2-4 issues per week as missing. 5. If you have open stacks, do you wish that you had closed stacks again? As noted above, most respondents had never had closed stacks, but only one library said "sometimes" in response to this question. Some comments: One library said that it took more resources to have a staffed current titles area. Another wished for a staffed service desk for their current titles (allow patrons to come in and browse, but restrict the material to in-room use) Another said that the "serendipity that results from open access is worth it." Another pointed out that patrons like open stacks, and it takes less staffing to accomplish. Once again, thanks to all. Our library has not yet made any decisions on change, but are mulling over the research. ********** Ann M. Tenglund Coordinator of Library Computer Services Friedsam Memorial Library and Resource Center St. Bonaventure University St. Bonaventure, NY 14778 INTERNET: ateng@sbu.edu VOICE: (716) 375-2378 FAX: (716) 375-2389 **********