Opinion on serials (fwd) Mitch Turitz 16 Jul 1992 19:13 UTC
I am forwarding the following from Autocat - I think it is very interesting from a patron's point of view -- Mitch Forwarded message: > Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1992 00:55:32 -0500 > From: Winship <winship@TENET.EDU> > Subject: Opinion on serials > > Dear AUTOCAT Folk; > > Having rashly volunteered to give an opinion to professionals on > how they ought to do their job, I find I cannot do so as briefly as I > would like. I could write a small book on the subject at hand and > not exhaust it (as I'm sure could most of you). Many of the points > I wished to raise have been addressed, in bits and pieces, by the many > who have contributed to AUTOCAT on this topic. However, fool that I am, > I shall dare. > > I assume this discussion has been primarily about what would generally > be called magazines, journals, newsletters, etc. > > I would say the overriding criterion for deciding the cataloging and > shelving of such material should be the needs of the library's users, > which will be different for each library. > > I have used libraries which classify all periodicals and shelve them > with all other material of the same class. This arrangement is excellent > for a library geared to scholarly research. If one is researching a par- > ticular idea it is nice to be able to find the majority of material on it > in a relatively small area of a large library. If this scheme is used, > *please* do not have the most recent, unbound issues in a different > location. > > That last sentence also applies to libraries which have all period- > icals in a central location. Latest issues with the older, bound > volumes, please, regardless of whether the collection is alphabetical > or otherwise. > > In a library with a broader range of users, I believe alphabetical is > the way to go. As someone mentioned, many people check the periodicals > with a particular item in mind without looking in the catalog, periodicals > list, or what have you. Also, the commercial indexes of articles do not > generally give call numbers. It is a real pain to search indexes for > pertinent articles and *then* have to find where *this* library's > librarians decided to hide the periodical(s) you need. And yes, I do > quite often feel that finding what I want in a library is a game of hide > and seek. > > The matter of title changes in an alphabetized arrangement does > present problems. I give you carte blanche to do as you please with the > nightmare of an irregular publication whose issuers can't remember what > they called it last time; if no one can find the stuff, tough luck. > > When considering long running, regular publications with a span of > years and many issues between title changes, the situation is different. > If the title changes, please keep the previous issues in the same place > under the old title and put the new issues where they belong alphabetically > with the new title. By all means, put dummies on the shelves indicating > the change of title, but make it clear what is going on ("continued as", > "preceded by" and the like are rather cryptic and not immediately clear > to the uninitiated). > > Summary: > Whatever arrangement is used should fit the needs of the users, > not the convenience of the staff, and *definitely* not the > whim of some new administrator. > If classed, shelve with other material of same class. > If alphabetized (preferable in most cases), keep it strictly so: > if the title changes, don't move all of it to the new title. > Regardless of system used, put the most recent issues with the > older, bound volumes. > > I realize much of what I've said pertains more to shelving than > cataloging, but since much of the discussion has been slanted that way > I haven't a guilty conscience. I figure you folk can sort out the > cataloging ramifications of my opinions, if you so wish. > > If I haven't addressed someone's question or position (I haven't > spoken to browsing, for example, as there are different forms, to > different ends), let me know directly and as explicitly as possible and > I'll respond as able. > > Please direct all flames to winship@tenet.edu rather than burdening > AUTOCAT <or SERIALST> > > Cordially, > > Douglas Winship > Austin, Texas > winship@tenet.edu