Re: newspapers (Rick Gildemeister) Marcia Tuttle 13 Jul 1995 19:33 UTC
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 13:49:20 EDT From: Enrique E. Gildemeister <EEGLC%CUNYVM.bitnet@uvmvm.uvm.edu> Subject: Re: newspapers (Ted Rogers) I dug into my bibliographic tools and found the Newspaper Cataloging and Union Listing Manual, for the United States Newspaper Program. They use the ISO definition, and then give "This definition includes ..." and "This definition excludes: Newsletter publications that are intended to report only news of a particular organization or institution, or that are specifically limited to coverage of a business, industry, craft, market, etc. At New York University between 1984 and 1987 we did a retrospective serials cataloging project, and we hung the definitions in our cubicles and on the walls by our desks. The ethnic publications in foreign languages we always did as newspapers. We did some preservation filming of reams of newspapers in our "newspaper morgue" that were not only in foreign languages but were of general interest even though the publications were the official organs of political parties or trade unions; we considered them newspapers. The ones we excluded from the definition were trade union tabloids that had some general news but in the context of how it involved workers. Those of us "in the trenches" cataloging all this stuff didn't know that NYU had applied for a grant to film and catalog New York State newspapers. We asked whether they meant "newspapers" as they have been defined in the standard or whether union tabloids were included. We got blank looks, and the answer, "you know, newspapers!" We pursued it further up the hierarchy. We contacted the funding agency -- nobody knew, we went higher and higher up the decision-making hierarchy. We always got the answer, "You know, newspapers!" At that time actually, we referred to excluded publications as being "in newspaper format, but not newspapers according to the CONSER definition". (I have to say, I *think* it involved CONSER, I don't remember). What finally happened was we applied the grant, I think,to anything that looked like a newspaper. We still coded the serial type as "p" not "n". The point I'm trying to bring out is that these definitions cause people to do a lot of pondering. We did however see one union tabloid done as part of the News- paper project. Anyway, I like the amplification of the definition given on p. iv-v of the Manual. I've already given the "excludes"; I'll give you the "includes": *All general interest newspapers mainly reporting events that have occurred within the 24-hour periodbefore going to press. *Non-daily general interest newspapers which provide news covering a longer period of time, but which owing to their local origin or for other reasons, provide their readers with a primary source of general information. *Daily and non-daily newspapers that contain news and information on the basis of an ethnic, racial, cultureal or national group. *Newspapers produced by the alternative press, if they provide their readers with a primary source of general news on current events. *Newspapers serving a military community such as an airbase or military post when they carry news of current events of general interest to a particular community. _The Newspaper cataloging and union listing manual_ I have is dated 1990. Hope this info. helps. ******************************************************************* * Rick Gildemeister * * Head of Cataloging/OCLC Enhance Coordinator * * Lehman College, CUNY * * "Facilis descensus Averno" * * Voice: (718) 960-8831 * * Fax: (718) 960-8952 * * BITNET: eeglc@cunyvm * * Internet: eeglc@cunyvm.cuny.edu * *******************************************************************