Well, how about acting like the American colonial leaders in 1776? There once again we find a group of prominent local citizens of a far-flung, slow-communication empire deciding that their own interests would be better served by grabbing control for themselves.

Any time a region has a tenuous link to the center of power, you're going to see this pressure to split off as an independent entity. It doesn't even have to be violent. E.g., Roman Britain just sort of faded into being plain old Britain as the power and reach of the (very) distant imperial core faded out. Nobody woke up one day and said "Hey, we're not Romans anymore!" But in 300 CE they were very much Romans, while in 600 CE they very much were not.

On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 7:29 PM Kelly St. Clair <xxxxxx@efn.org> wrote:
Part of the issue is that the Imperium operates at (at least) two scales
and, often, two (or more) social paradigms.  There's THE IMPERIUM, a
sector-spanning feudal state; and there's individual systems and worlds,
which can be thoroughly modern societies.  And so we're stuck
considering how the latter set of attitudes and social behaviors slot
into the former.  It's not really plausible (IMO) for the leader(s) of a
TL12+ HiPop world to act and think like Iron Age chieftains when dealing
with their peers on the interstellar stage, just because that's their
place in the larger social order.

--
---------------
Kelly St. Clair
xxxxxx@efn.org

-----
The Traveller Mailing List
Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
To unsubscribe from this list please go to
http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=PltOdItWBSgOP4y0Q6abkGbDI1eus0lz


--
"What is now proved was once only imagined." - William Blake