On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Richard Aiken <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Dave <xxxxxx@usa.net> wrote:
 
I think that perhaps they mean using the discarding sabot style round.

I've been thinking about it. And I'm wondering if maybe the reporter simply misunderstood what he was being told. 

Nope.


**

“There are two technologies coming out of the rail gun program that both show very high promise,” he said. “One is the rail gun itself, and two is the projectile we need to shoot out of that rail gun, a hypervelocity projectile. Something that goes at high speeds that comes out of that barrel and is able to hit a spot multiple dozens of miles away.”

The goal, he said, is to make the projectile “usable for more than just rail gun. Can I take my powder guns and use that same sort of projectile?” The technology in the projectile, he added, “actually is what enables it to fly that distance with that accuracy.”


**


The director appears to intend the rounds to have some sort of terminal guidance so that they can be on target at extreme ranges.

And he thinks that technology should be transferable to other platforms.

He very clearly does not intend that the railgun rounds themselves be fired by artillery.  


Dan



-- 

"Any sufficiently advanced parody is indistinguishable from a genuine kook." -Alan Morgan