J3 Evyn MacDude (25 Dec 2018 19:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Phil Pugliese (25 Dec 2018 21:34 UTC)
RE: [TML] J3 Frank Filz (29 Dec 2018 06:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Evyn MacDude (31 Dec 2018 02:43 UTC)
RE: [TML] J3 Frank Filz (02 Jan 2019 17:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Ethan McKinney (02 Jan 2019 19:42 UTC)
RE: [TML] J3 Frank Filz (02 Jan 2019 21:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Kurt Feltenberger (03 Jan 2019 00:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Phil Pugliese (03 Jan 2019 00:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Evyn MacDude (04 Jan 2019 00:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Greg Nokes (04 Jan 2019 01:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Kurt Feltenberger (04 Jan 2019 02:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Cian Witherspoon (04 Jan 2019 03:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Tim (04 Jan 2019 04:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Phil Pugliese (04 Jan 2019 08:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Tim (04 Jan 2019 04:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Phil Pugliese (04 Jan 2019 08:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Evyn MacDude (04 Jan 2019 09:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Phil Pugliese (04 Jan 2019 22:32 UTC)
RE: [TML] J3 Frank Filz (04 Jan 2019 15:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Tim (05 Jan 2019 06:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Phil Pugliese (05 Jan 2019 18:21 UTC)
Economics [was] J3 Evyn MacDude (05 Jan 2019 23:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3 Catherine Berry (08 Jan 2019 20:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3 Phil Pugliese (08 Jan 2019 20:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3 Catherine Berry (08 Jan 2019 21:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3 evyn.macdude (08 Jan 2019 23:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3 Phil Pugliese (09 Jan 2019 00:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3 Greg Nokes (09 Jan 2019 00:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3 Rupert Boleyn (09 Jan 2019 00:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3 Richard Aiken (09 Jan 2019 04:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3 evyn.macdude (09 Jan 2019 04:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Economics [was] J3 Bruce Johnson (09 Jan 2019 18:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Bruce Johnson (06 Jan 2019 18:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Phil Pugliese (06 Jan 2019 20:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Tim (06 Jan 2019 23:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Tim (04 Jan 2019 03:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Evyn MacDude (04 Jan 2019 07:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Phil Pugliese (04 Jan 2019 08:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Rupert Boleyn (04 Jan 2019 03:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Phil Pugliese (07 Jan 2019 20:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Rupert Boleyn (07 Jan 2019 21:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Catherine Berry (08 Jan 2019 01:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Richard Aiken (08 Jan 2019 02:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Phil Pugliese (08 Jan 2019 20:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Catherine Berry (08 Jan 2019 21:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Phil Pugliese (09 Jan 2019 00:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Catherine Berry (09 Jan 2019 00:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Rupert Boleyn (09 Jan 2019 01:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Vareck Bostrom (09 Jan 2019 03:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Catherine Berry (09 Jan 2019 17:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Sudnadja (09 Jan 2019 18:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Catherine Berry (09 Jan 2019 18:34 UTC)
Off topic request for info; Re: [TML] J3 Phil Pugliese (10 Jan 2019 01:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 shadow@xxxxxx (18 Jan 2019 07:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Tim (18 Jan 2019 08:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Phil Pugliese (18 Jan 2019 09:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Tim (18 Jan 2019 13:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Sudnadja (09 Jan 2019 18:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Catherine Berry (09 Jan 2019 18:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Bruce Johnson (09 Jan 2019 19:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Catherine Berry (09 Jan 2019 19:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Ethan McKinney (02 Jan 2019 19:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Richard Aiken (09 Jan 2019 04:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 Catherine Berry (09 Jan 2019 17:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] J3 shadow@xxxxxx (18 Jan 2019 07:20 UTC)

Re: [TML] J3 Tim 06 Jan 2019 23:56 UTC

On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 06:52:51PM +0000, Bruce  Johnson wrote:
> If you're restricted to small ships, and interstellar trade is
> essentially a rounding error as a fraction of total trade, they why
> is there a need for an Imperium?

Concentration and organization of military force.  Sharing of
technological innovations.  Top-down political will.  Inertia.

Just because the one of the public stated purposes of the Imperium is
to protect trade and rule the space between the stars doesn't mean
that's the main thing it actually does.  By the published rules, it's
actually pretty much rubbish at both of those.

> Where does the money come from to support the gargantuan naval
> fleet, (plus scout service, marines, and other ancillary branches)
> the OTU requires? And why?

CT naval fleets aren't anywhere near gargantuan.  Even the capital and
operating costs of a thousand trillion credit squadrons are
practically a rounding error in the sum of gross planetary products of
worlds in the Imperium.

> What is the point of such a huge expense? The imperium faces no
> serious threat to it's existence (the Zhoodani have never penetrated
> farther than a subsector or so, and the Solomani likewise, never a
> threat to more than a subsector.

The question isn't what the Zhodani and Solomani have done, but what
they might do if the Imperium scrapped most of its military.

- Tim