Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Cian Witherspoon (03 Oct 2019 01:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Thomas RUX (03 Oct 2019 03:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Cian Witherspoon (03 Oct 2019 03:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Thomas RUX (03 Oct 2019 11:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Jeff Zeitlin (03 Oct 2019 23:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Thomas RUX (04 Oct 2019 02:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Cian Witherspoon (04 Oct 2019 03:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) shadow@xxxxxx (04 Oct 2019 14:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Jeff Zeitlin (05 Oct 2019 00:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Jeff Zeitlin (05 Oct 2019 00:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) shadow@xxxxxx (04 Oct 2019 14:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Thomas RUX (04 Oct 2019 20:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Catherine Berry (04 Oct 2019 21:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Jeffrey Schwartz (04 Oct 2019 13:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) shadow@xxxxxx (04 Oct 2019 14:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) shadow@xxxxxx (04 Oct 2019 14:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Cian Witherspoon (04 Oct 2019 17:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) shadow@xxxxxx (04 Oct 2019 14:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Rupert Boleyn (04 Oct 2019 15:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) shadow@xxxxxx (04 Oct 2019 21:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Cian Witherspoon (04 Oct 2019 23:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Rupert Boleyn (05 Oct 2019 03:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Jeff Zeitlin (05 Oct 2019 04:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Cian Witherspoon (05 Oct 2019 15:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) shadow@xxxxxx (05 Oct 2019 20:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Kelly St. Clair (05 Oct 2019 20:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) shadow@xxxxxx (06 Oct 2019 05:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) Jeff Zeitlin (06 Oct 2019 19:10 UTC)

Re: [TML] Discussion Topic: Ansible Models (non 3I) shadow@xxxxxx 04 Oct 2019 14:14 UTC

Ok, there are a number of variables here:

Type of transmission:
Broadcast (aanybody in range can receive it)
"beamcast" (directional, but anybody in the right direction can
recioeve it)
point to point (either you have to be near the destination point to
receive it, or *only* the destination unit can recieve it)

Range
does it obey the inverse square law or some other function of range
if not, does it just "chop off" at range?

speed (how fast does the signal move)

bandwidth (how many symbols per second?)

"symbol set" (how many different "states" does the signal have?)

Then we get into things like size of unit, of antenna, etc. Powerr
requirements. And more.

Oh yeah, special conditions. Does it require a strong gravity field?
A weak one? Or some other thing that limits the location of
transmitters/receivers.

--
Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
shadow at shadowgard dot com