Re: [TML] Where the UPP fails me... shadow@xxxxxx 02 May 2020 10:04 UTC
On 1 May 2020 at 13:53, xxxxxx@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 9:07 PM shadow at shadowgard.com (via tml > list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com> wrote: > Ringworlds require unreasonably strong materials. Dyson spheres > are worse. > > But Alderson discs take the prize. they need some sort of > reinforcing to prevent them collapsing radially into a sphere. > Worse, the amount of material required would use up all the matter > in quite a few solar systems. Like hundreds or thousands. Probably > more than that (I don't feel like doing the math right now). > > I recall someone once did an analysis of Babylon 5 station based on > the mass quoted in the introduction and the dimensions of the station. > The conclusion: Yes, this is in fact build of Unobtainium. It's way > too light for its size by orders of magnitude. That may have been *me* over on the babylon-5 usenet group. As I pointed out to JMS, the *air* in the station would mass more than the mass they gave for it. It's a fairly common sort of innumeracy, caused by ignorance of the square-cube law. A one meter cube of water masses a metric ton. A one meter cube of air masses a kilogram. A one kilometer cube of water masses a *billion* metric tons. A one kilometer cube of air masses a million metric tons. If proportions remain the same, then a change in linear dimensions of X, results in changes in area of X^2 and volume of X^3. -- Leonard Erickson (aka shadow) shadow at shadowgard dot com