MgT2 Low Berths kaladorn@xxxxxx (28 May 2020 07:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths Timothy Collinson (28 May 2020 08:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths Alex Goodwin (28 May 2020 08:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths shadow@xxxxxx (08 Jun 2020 04:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths Greg Nokes (28 May 2020 08:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths Jeff Zeitlin (28 May 2020 10:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths Timothy Collinson (28 May 2020 10:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths kaladorn@xxxxxx (28 May 2020 17:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths shadow@xxxxxx (08 Jun 2020 04:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths Rupert Boleyn (08 Jun 2020 04:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths kaladorn@xxxxxx (08 Jun 2020 05:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths Alex Goodwin (28 May 2020 17:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths kaladorn@xxxxxx (28 May 2020 17:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths Alex Goodwin (28 May 2020 18:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths kaladorn@xxxxxx (29 May 2020 05:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths Kelly St. Clair (29 May 2020 02:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths kaladorn@xxxxxx (29 May 2020 05:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) David Johnson (29 May 2020 14:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) kaladorn@xxxxxx (29 May 2020 16:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) Phil Pugliese (29 May 2020 21:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) kaladorn@xxxxxx (29 May 2020 21:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] People's Revolutionary Front (was: "Dark" Imperium?) Kelly St. Clair (29 May 2020 23:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] People's Revolutionary Front (was: "Dark" Imperium?) James Catchpole (29 May 2020 23:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] People's Revolutionary Front (was: "Dark" Imperium?) James Catchpole (30 May 2020 11:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) David Johnson (30 May 2020 03:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) kaladorn@xxxxxx (30 May 2020 05:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) David Johnson (31 May 2020 04:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) kaladorn@xxxxxx (31 May 2020 06:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) David Johnson (01 Jun 2020 00:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) Phil Pugliese (01 Jun 2020 01:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) Richard Aiken (01 Jun 2020 01:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) Richard Aiken (01 Jun 2020 01:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) kaladorn@xxxxxx (01 Jun 2020 02:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) Phil Pugliese (02 Jun 2020 04:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) kaladorn@xxxxxx (01 Jun 2020 02:36 UTC)
(missing)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) James Catchpole (01 Jun 2020 08:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? Thomas Jones-Low (01 Jun 2020 21:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? James Catchpole (01 Jun 2020 22:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? Rupert Boleyn (02 Jun 2020 00:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? shadow@xxxxxx (08 Jun 2020 22:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? James Catchpole (08 Jun 2020 22:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? kaladorn@xxxxxx (08 Jun 2020 23:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? James Catchpole (08 Jun 2020 23:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) Timothy Collinson (01 Jun 2020 08:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) kaladorn@xxxxxx (01 Jun 2020 21:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) James Catchpole (01 Jun 2020 22:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) Phil Pugliese (02 Jun 2020 11:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) Timothy Collinson (02 Jun 2020 13:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) kaladorn@xxxxxx (02 Jun 2020 16:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) David Johnson (02 Jun 2020 02:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) Phil Pugliese (02 Jun 2020 14:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) kaladorn@xxxxxx (02 Jun 2020 16:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) Richard Aiken (02 Jun 2020 17:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) kaladorn@xxxxxx (02 Jun 2020 19:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) Phil Pugliese (02 Jun 2020 21:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) Richard Aiken (02 Jun 2020 22:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) Phil Pugliese (02 Jun 2020 21:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) kaladorn@xxxxxx (03 Jun 2020 04:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) James Catchpole (02 Jun 2020 22:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) Phil Pugliese (02 Jun 2020 22:17 UTC)
Yokel Noble (was: "Dark" Imperium?) David Johnson (03 Jun 2020 00:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble (was: "Dark" Imperium?) Richard Aiken (03 Jun 2020 01:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble (was: "Dark" Imperium?) Phil Pugliese (03 Jun 2020 02:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble (was: "Dark" Imperium?) kaladorn@xxxxxx (03 Jun 2020 04:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble (was: "Dark" Imperium?) Phil Pugliese (03 Jun 2020 08:56 UTC)
(missing)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble Rupert Boleyn (03 Jun 2020 09:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble Kelly St. Clair (03 Jun 2020 15:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble Phil Pugliese (03 Jun 2020 19:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble kaladorn@xxxxxx (03 Jun 2020 21:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble Rupert Boleyn (03 Jun 2020 23:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble Phil Pugliese (04 Jun 2020 07:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble Rupert Boleyn (04 Jun 2020 11:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble Phil Pugliese (04 Jun 2020 15:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble kaladorn@xxxxxx (04 Jun 2020 15:34 UTC)
(missing)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble James Catchpole (04 Jun 2020 16:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble kaladorn@xxxxxx (04 Jun 2020 23:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble Phil Pugliese (05 Jun 2020 02:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble kaladorn@xxxxxx (05 Jun 2020 04:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble James Catchpole (05 Jun 2020 08:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble Timothy Collinson (05 Jun 2020 08:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble Phil Pugliese (06 Jun 2020 00:08 UTC)
[TML] Yokel Noble Phil Pugliese (06 Jun 2020 00:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble Rupert Boleyn (04 Jun 2020 16:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble kaladorn@xxxxxx (04 Jun 2020 16:31 UTC)
Basic vs Extended chargen (was Re: [TML] Yokel Noble) Jeff Zeitlin (04 Jun 2020 19:43 UTC)
Re: Basic vs Extended chargen (was Re: [TML] Yokel Noble) James Catchpole (04 Jun 2020 22:18 UTC)
Re: Basic vs Extended chargen (was Re: [TML] Yokel Noble) kaladorn@xxxxxx (05 Jun 2020 01:08 UTC)
Re: Basic vs Extended chargen (was Re: [TML] Yokel Noble) Rupert Boleyn (05 Jun 2020 04:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Yokel Noble (was: "Dark" Imperium?) kaladorn@xxxxxx (03 Jun 2020 21:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? (was: MgT2 Low Berths) kaladorn@xxxxxx (03 Jun 2020 04:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? Rupert Boleyn (03 Jun 2020 06:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? kaladorn@xxxxxx (03 Jun 2020 20:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? Rupert Boleyn (03 Jun 2020 23:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] "Dark" Imperium? kaladorn@xxxxxx (04 Jun 2020 00:55 UTC)

Re: [TML] MgT2 Low Berths Jeff Zeitlin 28 May 2020 10:18 UTC

On Thu, 28 May 2020 03:52:02 -0400, xxxxxx@gmail.com wrote to Freelance
Traveller:

>Questions:
>Rulebook says that when revived, a Medic Check is made:
>+ END DM
>+1 TL-12+ ship
>-1 Emergency Low Berth
>-2 Non-Humans
>
>Not present and I can't find it in the text anywhere:
>What difficulty is that medic check? Average(8+)?
>
>And discussion points:
>
>+1 TL-12+ ship? Why ship? Presumption of better med facilities? But that
>might not be true. And if I had a TL 12+ Berth on an older ships, shouldn't
>I still get the +1 DM? Seems to me the *berth* is more applicable than
>ship.

Not necessarily; it depends on how much external computer support the LB
needs. If the LB is a 'fixed mount' (which is what I assume as the
default), then I would assume that it relies fairly heavily on external
computer support from the facility, and the external computer TL should
govern. If you have a 'self-contained' LB (SCLB), which can be moved while
in use, then I would assume that it is less reliant on external computer
support, and its own TL should govern. However, for a SCLB, I would double
the volume vs the 'book', and increase the cost - probably by a similar
factor - as well.

>-2 Non-Humans - really? One would think that Aslan, Vargr, and esp Hivers
>would have worked out a version for themselves. So if we had one of their
>ships, would humans take -2? Or all other major races and minor? Or are
>some races not at all able to do cold sleep?

I would Rule Zero this into something along the lines of

    -1   Revival Tech of different race from revivee, and has no Xenomed
         skill for revivee race. Note that if both RT and Revivee are
         "human", this does _not_ apply for any combination of 'Standard
         Imperial', 'Standard Vilani', 'Standard Solomani', 'Sword
         Worlder', etc., but does apply if either the tech or the revivee
         are Geonee, genetic Luriani (as opposed to Mmarislusant[=Standard
         Vilani] or Verasti Dtareen[=Standard Solomani] cultural Luriani),
         or any other 'minor human' race at significant variance with the
         'norm'. In the case where both are of the _same_ 'minor human'
         race, this does not apply. Obviously, where either or both are
         non-human, but not the same non-human, this applies; it would not
         apply if they are both the same non-human race.

    -1   LB not designed for/not certified for use with revivee race. This
         applies to minor human races at significant variance, as well as
         non-human. I would tend to rule that ships within a minor race's
         sphere of influence will generally have LBs certified for use with
         that minor race (roll 3D for 6- for a ship not to be, DM -1 for
         each jump away from nearest world where that minor race is 10%+ of
         world pop).

>And also, if you are a major polity that happens to have a minority of
>(forex Vargr), would one not seek to procure the right sorts of berths?

>And what about a multi-race capable berth?

Covered by the 'LB not designed/certified' penalty.

>How long do we figure your berth can last without power? (Non-emergency
>version) And does it auto-defrost then and hope for the best? Or just seize
>up and you die asleep?

Fixed mount: I would rule that there is sufficient on-board capability to
hold for an hour, plus revival time. If the power stays out for that hour,
the revival cycle is immediately started, and cannot be stopped, even if
power is restored. Apply penalties for no revival tech present.

SCLB: Six hours, then cycle starts as above.

(I should write an article for this...)

®Traveller is a registered trademark of
Far Future Enterprises, 1977-2020. Use of
the trademark in this notice and in the
referenced materials is not intended to
infringe or devalue the trademark.

--
Jeff Zeitlin, Editor
Freelance Traveller
    The Electronic Fan-Supported Traveller® Resource
xxxxxx@freelancetraveller.com
http://www.freelancetraveller.com

Freelance Traveller extends its thanks to the following
enterprises for hosting services:

onCloud/CyberWeb Enterprises (http://www.oncloud.io)
The Traveller Downport (http://www.downport.com)