A reminder...'rocket science' is a cultural referent for 'hard to do' for a reason...
Bruce Johnson
(28 Oct 2014 23:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] A reminder...'rocket science' is a cultural referent for 'hard to do' for a reason...
Richard Aiken
(29 Oct 2014 00:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] A reminder...'rocket science' is a cultural referent for 'hard to do' for a reason...
Brad Rogers
(29 Oct 2014 08:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] A reminder...'rocket science' is a cultural referent for 'hard to do' for a reason...
David Shaw
(29 Oct 2014 18:26 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] A reminder...'rocket science' is a cultural referent for 'hard to do' for a reason...
Brad Rogers
(29 Oct 2014 18:47 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] A reminder...'rocket science' is a cultural referent for 'hard to do' for a reason... Bruce Johnson (29 Oct 2014 20:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] A reminder...'rocket science' is a cultural referent for 'hard to do' for a reason...
Craig Berry
(30 Oct 2014 01:19 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] A reminder...'rocket science' is a cultural referent for 'hard to do' for a reason... Bruce Johnson 29 Oct 2014 20:48 UTC
On Oct 29, 2014, at 11:26 AM, David Shaw <dj.shaw@btconnect.com> wrote: > I was told - many years ago, so things may well have changed since - that rocket flight was considered so risky that it cost as much to insure a rocket as to build it, so nobody bothered. The fact that one company will now offer such insurance tends to suggest that the perceived risk is now lower - or that there are a lot of financially inept people in rocketing ;-) There are commercially-owned satellite systems, and have been for some time. There are also commercial launch enterprises, (albeit quasi-governmental, such as Arianespace) Insurance has been available for quite a while; without it standard capital funding wouldn’t be available. Lloyds has been insuring satellite launches for quite a while now. -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs