Could someone check my maths, please? David Shaw (14 Jan 2015 18:47 UTC)
RE: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Anthony Jackson (14 Jan 2015 18:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? shadow@xxxxxx (15 Jan 2015 06:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Kelly St. Clair (14 Jan 2015 18:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Craig Berry (14 Jan 2015 19:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? David Shaw (15 Jan 2015 23:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Richard Aiken (16 Jan 2015 04:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Kelly St. Clair (16 Jan 2015 04:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Richard Aiken (16 Jan 2015 05:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Richard Aiken (16 Jan 2015 05:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Greg Nokes (16 Jan 2015 23:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Richard Aiken (17 Jan 2015 08:49 UTC)

RE: [TML] Could someone check my maths, please? Anthony Jackson 14 Jan 2015 18:54 UTC

From: David Shaw
>
> I have never attempted relativistic calculations before and wondered if
> I have this right.
>
> I am currently reading John Ringo's 'Gust Front' in which a ground
> based anti-starship weapon is described as firing bars of depleted
> uranium, 100mm in diameter and two metres long at a muzzle velocity of
> 0.3c.
>
> I make this a KE of 1.302 exa-Joules, equivalent to a touch over 311MT
> of TNT.  Is this right?  And would such a weapon system really be
> feasible within an Earth-standard atmosphere?

It's John Ringo. *Never* do the math. In any case, no, it won't work, I'm not sure if it will even escape the atmosphere, but even if it does, it will do so as a rapidly expanding cone, not a solid projectile.