Taking the Bridge Jim Vassilakos (19 Aug 2015 18:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge W. Hopper (19 Aug 2015 19:10 UTC)
RE: [TML] Taking the Bridge Anthony Jackson (19 Aug 2015 21:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Grimmund (19 Aug 2015 21:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Dan Corrin (19 Aug 2015 21:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx (19 Aug 2015 23:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Tim (20 Aug 2015 03:26 UTC)
RE: [TML] Taking the Bridge Jeff Rowse (20 Aug 2015 06:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Tim (20 Aug 2015 09:38 UTC)
RE: [TML] Taking the Bridge Ewan Quibell (20 Aug 2015 11:04 UTC)
RE: [TML] Taking the Bridge Phil Pugliese (20 Aug 2015 12:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Kelly St. Clair (20 Aug 2015 16:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Phil Pugliese (20 Aug 2015 19:01 UTC)
RE: [TML] Taking the Bridge Jeff Rowse (21 Aug 2015 12:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Richard Aiken (20 Aug 2015 20:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge shadow@xxxxxx (20 Aug 2015 16:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Jeffrey Schwartz (21 Aug 2015 15:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Grimmund (21 Aug 2015 16:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Jeffrey Schwartz (21 Aug 2015 16:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Bruce Johnson (21 Aug 2015 17:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Grimmund (21 Aug 2015 17:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Bruce Johnson (21 Aug 2015 20:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Richard Aiken (25 Aug 2015 02:55 UTC)

Re: [TML] Taking the Bridge Jeffrey Schwartz 21 Aug 2015 16:23 UTC

On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Grimmund <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
> Excellent.
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Jeffrey Schwartz
> <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> IMTU YMMV there's a fair bit of robotics that are so common they're
>> ignored. Take the 3I's version of the "Roomba" as an example. These
>> should be accessible from the network, and controllable. How useful
>> that is is another question... unless you have a Roomba, some duct
>> tape, and some demo.
>
> Although those robots, like the standard Roomba, may not have controls
> that are all that dedicated or granular.
>
> Our Roomba controls were pretty much limited to scheduling when it
> ran, and a limiter for the area.
>
> It may not be nearly as useful as, say, a remote controlled toy, which
> you really can stear and which may very well be equiped with video
> camera(s) to allow the pilot to get a direct POV view of the remote's
> environment.

True, but not all ships will have remote controlled toys...

On the other hand, hooking demo to the wires that control the vacuum
cleaner motor and scheduling "Cleanup in stateroom 3, ASAP!" would be
useful.