Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships in Jump TU, was: Instant city Phil Pugliese 13 Feb 2016 11:04 UTC

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well for those who mind playing 'kick the can(on)' there's always the jump torps found in CT Adv4 'Leviathan'.
And those were, at that time, actually canon!
I've even been informed that MM himself actually refereed it, back in the old days at GDW.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On Fri, 2/12/16, Craig Berry <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships in Jump TU, was: Instant city
 To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com
 Date: Friday, February 12, 2016, 8:26 PM

 It's
 well established by canon that 100dt is the lower boundary
 on what can enter Jump. Less clear is whether you need a
 sentient on board; if not, automated "jump
 torpedoes" become a great way to carry messages around.
 But if they're possible, the crewed XBoat network makes
 no sense, and that's pretty deeply embedded in canon. I
 don't think anything in canon attempts to explain why
 you need a sentient on board.
 On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at
 7:15 PM, Greg Chalik <mrg3105@gmail.com>
 wrote:
 I'm
 curious. Exactly why can't Jump drives be
 miniaturised?
 And, if they
 can be, to what scale?
 The reason is,
 it would be an automated procedure to release a message pod
 with a miniature Jump drive that would replicate in reverse
 the Jump the ship just made, i.e. returning to the
 ship's point-of-origin to transmit "All OK"
 Failure for
 such a pod to materialise would sound alarm immediatelly.

 Greg

 On 13
 February 2016 at 13:24, Craig Berry <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
 wrote:
 Yep. The Age of Sail provides the only reasonable
 model for Traveller interstellar warfare. Fleet commanders
 have tremendous autonomy, because they need it; once away
 from bases, their information will be at least a week
 fresher than HQ's, and that number increases the farther
 the fleet moves from the nearest base.
 I once had fun trying to imagine
 what tactical and strategic planning maps might look like in
 Traveller. You'd have to label every asset with the time
 at which it was known to be at that location, and then have
 secondary versions of that asset spread across all the
 places it could be now, weighted by probability. I was
 picturing color coding -- yellow/orange/red for increasingly
 old intel about the enemy, violet/blue/green for
 increasingly old intel about friendlies. Add on notations
 for where friendlies are supposed to be headed in the
 future, where enemies are predicted to be going, and your
 own alternatives, and you get a map that's trying to
 display about nine dimensions of data in two or three
 dimensions of display. :) I'm sure that learning to read
 and use such displays takes up a fair amount of time in
 Naval officer training.
 On Fri, Feb 12, 2016
 at 6:06 PM, Bruce  Johnson <xxxxxx@pharmacy.arizona.edu>
 wrote:

 > On Feb 12, 2016, at 6:39 PM, William Ewing (via tml
 list) <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
 wrote:

 >

 > The USS Indianapolis dropped off the a-bomb, and left
 for it's classified next port. Noone knew her schedule,
 noone tracked her. So when she was sunk, noone knew to look
 for her. Because of that, we now have to file movement
 reports. We list all waypoints of each transit, and the
 scheduled arrivals at each. If we are more than 4 hours
 ahead of or behind our Plan of Intended Movement, then we
 have to send a new MOVREP. That narrows a missing ship down
 to an 8-hour window at PIM-speed (typically 15 knots or
 less, so within 60 nautical miles of where we should have
 been, if 15 is PIM-speed.

 The Imperium CANNOT DO THIS. The most recent
 information the IN can possibly have of a ship that is not
 in a particular system is 7 days old. That increases by 7
 days for every two parsecs (presuming the use of J2
 Scouts/Couriers for comms) farther away the ship is. And
 they cannot get something *back* to where the ship was
 supposed to be except in the same time.

 The existence of jump lag prevents this kind of close
 command and control; HQ might be *months* behind the front
 lines.

 The absolute worst case of a misjump is 36 parsecs, which is
 107 days away from where a ship is supposed to be at J2.

 That’s roughly 4 months.

 The IN operates like Admiral Nelson’s Navy, not Admiral
 Halsey’s.

 --

 Bruce Johnson

 University of Arizona

 College of Pharmacy

 Information Technology Group

 Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs

 -----

 The Traveller Mailing List

 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml

 Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com

 To unsubscribe from this list please goto

 http://archives.simplelists.com

 --
 Craig Berry (http://google.com/+CraigBerry)
 "Eternity is in love with the productions
 of time." - William Blake

 -----
 The Traveller Mailing List
 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
 Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
 To unsubscribe from this list please goto
 http://archives.simplelists.com

 -----
 The Traveller Mailing List
 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
 Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
 To unsubscribe from this list please goto
 http://archives.simplelists.com

 --
 Craig Berry (http://google.com/+CraigBerry)
 "Eternity is in love with the productions
 of time." - William Blake

 -----
 The Traveller Mailing List
 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
 Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
 To unsubscribe from this list please goto
 http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=EwREIRgLK8vaUEhNlnoNdSGKwnjoID8a