Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity David Jaques-Watson (15 Feb 2016 09:39 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (16 Feb 2016 00:55 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (16 Feb 2016 08:06 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Craig Berry (16 Feb 2016 18:11 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (16 Feb 2016 20:52 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Craig Berry (16 Feb 2016 21:02 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Craig Berry (16 Feb 2016 23:16 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (17 Feb 2016 00:55 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Craig Berry (17 Feb 2016 01:08 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (17 Feb 2016 01:41 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity tmr0195@xxxxxx (17 Feb 2016 02:36 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (17 Feb 2016 03:40 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Craig Berry (17 Feb 2016 03:46 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Bruce Johnson (17 Feb 2016 03:55 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Craig Berry (17 Feb 2016 04:06 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (17 Feb 2016 04:19 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity tmr0195@xxxxxx (17 Feb 2016 06:23 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Bruce Johnson (17 Feb 2016 03:52 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity shadow@xxxxxx (21 Feb 2016 01:47 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (23 Feb 2016 10:23 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Bruce Johnson (23 Feb 2016 18:04 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Bruce Johnson (17 Feb 2016 03:22 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity shadow@xxxxxx (21 Feb 2016 01:47 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (16 Feb 2016 23:42 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (16 Feb 2016 23:53 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Craig Berry (17 Feb 2016 00:03 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (17 Feb 2016 00:11 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (17 Feb 2016 00:08 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (17 Feb 2016 01:12 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (17 Feb 2016 00:16 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Craig Berry (17 Feb 2016 00:23 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (17 Feb 2016 00:34 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Craig Berry (17 Feb 2016 00:37 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Bruce Johnson (17 Feb 2016 03:45 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity tmr0195@xxxxxx (17 Feb 2016 06:39 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Bruce Johnson (17 Feb 2016 03:33 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Kenneth Barns (17 Feb 2016 08:59 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (17 Feb 2016 09:50 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Bruce Johnson (17 Feb 2016 14:39 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Kelly St. Clair (17 Feb 2016 02:24 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (17 Feb 2016 03:32 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (17 Feb 2016 03:36 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (17 Feb 2016 04:00 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Kelly St. Clair (17 Feb 2016 04:18 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (17 Feb 2016 04:32 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (17 Feb 2016 04:37 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (17 Feb 2016 05:02 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Kelly St. Clair (17 Feb 2016 04:13 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (17 Feb 2016 05:13 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity tmr0195@xxxxxx (17 Feb 2016 07:34 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (17 Feb 2016 09:47 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (17 Feb 2016 12:18 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (17 Feb 2016 19:43 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Craig Berry (17 Feb 2016 19:55 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity tmr0195@xxxxxx (17 Feb 2016 16:54 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (17 Feb 2016 19:59 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Craig Berry (17 Feb 2016 20:46 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity tmr0195@xxxxxx (17 Feb 2016 23:09 UTC)
[TML] Adventure in the Far Future Kelly St. Clair (18 Feb 2016 01:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Adventure in the Far Future Craig Berry (18 Feb 2016 05:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Adventure in the Far Future Richard Aiken (18 Feb 2016 08:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] Adventure in the Far Future Kelly St. Clair (18 Feb 2016 09:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Adventure in the Far Future tmr0195@xxxxxx (18 Feb 2016 15:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Adventure in the Far Future Grimmund (18 Feb 2016 16:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] Adventure in the Far Future tmr0195@xxxxxx (18 Feb 2016 20:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Adventure in the Far Future Grimmund (18 Feb 2016 22:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Adventure in the Far Future tmr0195@xxxxxx (19 Feb 2016 00:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Adventure in the Far Future Grimmund (19 Feb 2016 15:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Adventure in the Far Future tmr0195@xxxxxx (19 Feb 2016 16:01 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (18 Feb 2016 06:17 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity William Ewing (18 Feb 2016 06:21 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (18 Feb 2016 06:38 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Bruce Johnson (18 Feb 2016 16:18 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Jeffrey Schwartz (18 Feb 2016 16:25 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Bruce Johnson (18 Feb 2016 16:38 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Jeffrey Schwartz (18 Feb 2016 16:51 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Bruce Johnson (18 Feb 2016 17:01 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity William Ewing (19 Feb 2016 22:41 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Bruce Johnson (19 Feb 2016 23:23 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity William Ewing (20 Feb 2016 09:05 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (20 Feb 2016 11:37 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity William Ewing (21 Feb 2016 05:48 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Bruce Johnson (17 Feb 2016 14:29 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Jeffrey Schwartz (17 Feb 2016 15:11 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity shadow@xxxxxx (21 Feb 2016 01:47 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (18 Feb 2016 06:09 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (18 Feb 2016 08:55 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (18 Feb 2016 09:01 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity tmr0195@xxxxxx (19 Feb 2016 00:15 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Craig Berry (19 Feb 2016 00:34 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity tmr0195@xxxxxx (19 Feb 2016 00:59 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Craig Berry (19 Feb 2016 03:55 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (19 Feb 2016 04:13 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity tmr0195@xxxxxx (19 Feb 2016 04:31 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (20 Feb 2016 05:10 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (20 Feb 2016 05:40 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity tmr0195@xxxxxx (20 Feb 2016 13:47 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Kelly St. Clair (20 Feb 2016 14:09 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity tmr0195@xxxxxx (20 Feb 2016 15:59 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Bruce Johnson (20 Feb 2016 17:59 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity tmr0195@xxxxxx (20 Feb 2016 21:11 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (23 Feb 2016 10:12 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Freelance Traveller (20 Feb 2016 22:38 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (23 Feb 2016 10:10 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (19 Feb 2016 08:28 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Richard Aiken (19 Feb 2016 08:41 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity tmr0195@xxxxxx (19 Feb 2016 14:12 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Kelly St. Clair (19 Feb 2016 14:39 UTC)
Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity Greg Chalik (23 Feb 2016 10:16 UTC)

Re: [TML]Tracking spaceships inJump TU, was: Instantcity shadow@xxxxxx 21 Feb 2016 01:47 UTC

On 17 Feb 2016 at 11:54, Greg Chalik wrote:

> However, it seems to me that following a misjump what the ship will
> lack is fuel, assuming a misjump will consume 100% of stored fuel.
> But, space is full of potential fuels, though perhaps not as
> efficient as purpose-designed fuels.
> So I'd say that the SOP would be to deploy massive scoops to start
> accumulating that matter to serve as fuel.
> Since hydrogen is the most abundant element in space, and judiciously
> is the canon jump fuel in liquid form.
> It seems to me then that the SOP for ANY ship in misjump is to
> 1. Deploy hydrogen scoops
> 2. when there is a sufficient quantity scooped, commence operation of
> the hydrogen liquifier converion unit (HLCU)
> 3. When the HLCU has acheived sufficient volume, commence transfer to
> fuel tanks
> 4. When there is enough liquid hydrogen in the fuel tanks, try for
> another jump.
>
> Is there a problem with this?

Yes. At ordinary speeds you won't accumulate hydrogen at useful
levels *ever*. Remember, you are operating in a hard vacuum. Hydrogen
atoms may be as high as a dozen per cubic meter.

Avogadro's number is the number of molecules in a mole. A mole of
hydrogen atoms would be one kilo.

Avogadro's number is 6.0221409e23.

So at 6 atoms per cubic meter, you'd have to run the scoops thru
100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 cubic meters of space to get one kilo
of fuel.

That's 100,000,000,000,000 cubic kilometers. For one kilo. For a
tonne of fuel, it'd be 100,000,000,000,000,000 km^3. That's a cube
464,159 km on a side.

You'd be scooping for a very, *very* long time.

Bussard ramjets (which turn out to not be workable) were supposed to
use magnetic fields hundreds of km across, and they'd need to be
moving at at least a few percent of c to scoop enough fuel.

alas, it turns pout that drag from the scoops won't let them get up
to a velocity that'd gather as much fuel as they'd need to run.

Only practical way to refuel in an "empty" hex is to find an icy body
and mine the ice. Neither of which is at all easy.

--
Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
shadow at shadowgard dot com