Re: K'kree vs Hiver, was Re: [TML] GMing Manipulations Phil Pugliese 12 May 2016 16:34 UTC

--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 5/12/16, Richard Aiken <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: K'kree vs Hiver, was Re: [TML] GMing Manipulations
 To: "tml" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
 Date: Thursday, May 12, 2016, 9:11 AM

 (Someone Whose ID I
 Accidentally Deleted Wrote): "I've always wondered
 why (the K'kree) didn't also redouble their efforts
 to wipe out the other 'threat' (hivers) that created
 the first one."
 I thought that went without saying; the
 K'kree had ZERO desire to discover what ELSE the Hivers
 had ready to deploy, in the event that their demands were
 not met.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Yeah, but that sounds a little too 'pat' for my taste.

Not to mention a little wimpy. Esp for a race as militant as the K'kree.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------