Hivers manipulating Hivers? was Re: K'kree vs Hiver, was Re: [TML] GMing Manipulations Phil Pugliese 16 May 2016 22:39 UTC

--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 5/16/16, Jeffrey Schwartz <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: K'kree vs Hiver, was Re: [TML] GMing Manipulations
 To: "tml" <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
 Date: Monday, May 16, 2016, 11:17 AM

 On Mon, May 16, 2016 at
 11:21 AM, Phil Pugliese (via tml list)
 <xxxxxx@simplelists.com>
 wrote:
 > This email was sent from
 yahoo.com which does not allow forwarding of emails via
 email lists. Therefore the sender's email address (xxxxxx@yahoo.com)
 has been replaced with a dummy one. The original message
 follows:
 >
 >     
 In theory, no one reads
 >  the
 "sealed" registered manipulations until after
 >  the
 >  registration
 Hiver unveils the
 >  conclusion of their
 master work. Canon is silent
 >  on what
 happens with the ongoing and failed
 > 
 manipulations.
 >
 > 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 >
 > I can see it now;
 >
 > "Hey that
 pompous fool 'what-iz-name' just kicked the bucket!
 His 'club' should be unsealing all his "works
 in progress". Let's go see what that incompetent
 jackass was up to for all these years."
 >
 >
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 I can picture the
 "pompous fool" having some plan in his
 portfolio
 that starts with : "First,
 convince the entire club that I'm a pompous
 fool"
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

In that case he'd have achieved the success of a post-mortem Manipulation!

I wonder if various Hiver factions are running Manipulations on each other?

WOW! Think of all the possibilities?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------