On 19 May 2016 at 20:40, Tim wrote:

> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 12:27:46AM -0700,  (via tml list) wrote:
> > I have trouble with that "relative to the planet bit, given that
> > said location isn't fixed.
>
> It's as fixed as anything else is.  Certainly your interpretation
> suffers from the same flaw.

How? I'm sayinng that you are "targetting" a specific distance in a
specfic direction.  And that the variance in exit location is
variance from that distance/angle.

that's not "relative" to anything except the departure point.

The other interpretation has you somehow having a base exit point
that is in different places depending on the duration of the jump.
--
Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
shadow at shadowgard dot com