The L-5 Society was going to... was Re: Multi Jumping is no big deal since LBB5v1, was Re: Incredibly efficient! was Re: [TML] L-Hyd not necessary for jumping & mi Phil Pugliese 26 May 2016 04:08 UTC

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This brings back some the old memories;

The old L-5 Society was going to use a similar method to assemble material at LaGrange points in order to build 'O'Neill Space Habitats'.

--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 5/25/16, Craig Berry <xxxxxx@gmail.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: Multi Jumping is no big deal since LBB5v1, was Re: Incredibly efficient! was Re: [TML] L-Hyd not necessary for jumping & mi
 To: xxxxxx@simplelists.com
 Cc: "Tim" <xxxxxx@little-possums.net>
 Date: Wednesday, May 25, 2016, 9:53 AM

 For really
 low-margin, high-bulk, non-perishable cargoes, I can easily
 see ballistic trajectories being used, with tugs pushing
 "barges" onto the right transfer trajectory, and
 other tugs catching them at the destination. The
 "barge" would just need to be a framework to hold
 the cargo together. Depending on your m-drive and
 g-compensator model, it would probably not even have to deal
 with acceleration stresses.
 On Wed, May 25, 2016 at
 7:30 AM, Jeffrey Schwartz <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
 wrote:
 On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Tim
 <xxxxxx@little-possums.net>
 wrote:

 > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:36:45PM -0700,  (via tml
 list) wrote:

 >> On 24 May 2016 at 0:15, Phil Pugliese (via tml
 list) wrote:

 >> > How far would you have to be travelling in
 order to require, let's say

 >> > it's the standard 'scout ship', a
 two-week constant 2G accell (towards

 >> > the 'target'), a coasting time of one
 week, & then a two-week decell

 >> > in order to arrive w/ only a small relative
 diff in velocity?

 >>

 >> If you have jump drive you'd never do this
 unless you *wanted* to

 >> waste a month for some reason. Because you can do
 it in a week by

 >> using the jump drive.

 >

 > If you have the jump fuel to waste, yes.  There are
 plenty of reasons

 > why you might want to get to the destination with full
 tanks.

 >

 Or it might be an in-system cargo hauler, where
 there's economic

 advantage to not having 10% of the hull taken up by fuel and
 the

 expense of a J-drive

 -----

 The Traveller Mailing List

 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml

 Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com

 To unsubscribe from this list please goto

 http://archives.simplelists.com

 --
 Craig Berry (http://google.com/+CraigBerry)
 "Eternity is in love with the productions
 of time." - William Blake

 -----
 The Traveller Mailing List
 Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
 Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
 To unsubscribe from this list please goto
 http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=EwREIRgLK8vaUEhNlnoNdSGKwnjoID8a