Now this would be a fun scenario Douglas Berry (16 Dec 2016 20:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Now this would be a fun scenario Greg Nokes (16 Dec 2016 20:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Now this would be a fun scenario Jeff Zeitlin (16 Dec 2016 23:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Now this would be a fun scenario Richard Aiken (17 Dec 2016 07:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Now this would be a fun scenario shadow@xxxxxx (17 Dec 2016 12:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] Now this would be a fun scenario Kelly St. Clair (18 Dec 2016 02:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Now this would be a fun scenario Richard Aiken (18 Dec 2016 04:24 UTC)

Re: [TML] Now this would be a fun scenario Kelly St. Clair 18 Dec 2016 02:08 UTC

On 12/17/2016 4:20 AM,  (via tml list) wrote:
> On 17 Dec 2016 at 2:14, Richard Aiken wrote:

>> I suggest a team effort:
>>
>> A small herd of megasheep, with each female carrying a 50 megaton
>> nuclear warhead in her uterus . . .
>
> And all of the sheep are infected carriers (ie asymptomatic) of a
> nasty strain of anthrax!

So the "payoff in goods in lieu of cash" to the nation's creditor(s) is
actually a trojan... sheep?

(Or do the recipients /know/ what they're getting, and this is a novel
method of trying to smuggle the nukes and/or biowar agent through
Imperial space?)

--
---------------
Kelly St. Clair
xxxxxx@efn.org