Now this would be a fun scenario
Douglas Berry
(16 Dec 2016 20:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Now this would be a fun scenario
Greg Nokes
(16 Dec 2016 20:36 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Now this would be a fun scenario
Jeff Zeitlin
(16 Dec 2016 23:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Now this would be a fun scenario
Richard Aiken
(17 Dec 2016 07:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Now this would be a fun scenario
shadow@xxxxxx
(17 Dec 2016 12:21 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Now this would be a fun scenario Kelly St. Clair (18 Dec 2016 02:09 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Now this would be a fun scenario
Richard Aiken
(18 Dec 2016 04:24 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Now this would be a fun scenario Kelly St. Clair 18 Dec 2016 02:08 UTC
On 12/17/2016 4:20 AM, (via tml list) wrote: > On 17 Dec 2016 at 2:14, Richard Aiken wrote: >> I suggest a team effort: >> >> A small herd of megasheep, with each female carrying a 50 megaton >> nuclear warhead in her uterus . . . > > And all of the sheep are infected carriers (ie asymptomatic) of a > nasty strain of anthrax! So the "payoff in goods in lieu of cash" to the nation's creditor(s) is actually a trojan... sheep? (Or do the recipients /know/ what they're getting, and this is a novel method of trying to smuggle the nukes and/or biowar agent through Imperial space?) -- --------------- Kelly St. Clair xxxxxx@efn.org