Re: For comment, please... Jonathan Clark (03 Jan 2017 22:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: For comment, please... Kelly St. Clair (04 Jan 2017 00:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: For comment, please... Jeff Zeitlin (05 Jan 2017 23:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: For comment, please... Kelly St. Clair (06 Jan 2017 21:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Re: For comment, please... Jeff Zeitlin (05 Jan 2017 23:15 UTC)

Re: [TML] Re: For comment, please... Kelly St. Clair 04 Jan 2017 00:07 UTC

On 1/3/2017 2:37 PM, Jonathan Clark wrote:
>
> FWIW (which may be nothing), I really disliked this bit. IMHO Traveler
> is supposed
> to be set in a more-or-less technological universe. This explanation is
> basically magic.
> Or, you've just invented a different sort of psionics.

That struck me as the poster's intent, really.
"I want mystery, I want inexplicable, I want strange and wonderful."
The thing is, the sort of people who tend to read and/or play SF want
/explanations/ for things.  They want reproducible results.  And so on.

--
---------------
Kelly St. Clair
xxxxxx@efn.org