Mongoose Traveller Douglas Berry (29 Jan 2017 00:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Evyn MacDude (29 Jan 2017 01:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller tmr0195@xxxxxx (29 Jan 2017 04:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Evyn MacDude (29 Jan 2017 04:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller tmr0195@xxxxxx (29 Jan 2017 04:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Evyn MacDude (29 Jan 2017 09:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx (29 Jan 2017 10:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Timothy Collinson (29 Jan 2017 11:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx (29 Jan 2017 13:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Timothy Collinson (29 Jan 2017 19:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx (29 Jan 2017 22:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Timothy Collinson (30 Jan 2017 22:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Evyn MacDude (30 Jan 2017 22:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Timothy Collinson (31 Jan 2017 15:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Bruce Johnson (31 Jan 2017 22:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Ken Matlock (31 Jan 2017 22:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Timothy Collinson (02 Feb 2017 22:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Ethan McKinney (02 Feb 2017 22:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Timothy Collinson (03 Feb 2017 08:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Bruce Johnson (02 Feb 2017 22:22 UTC)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Timothy Collinson (03 Feb 2017 08:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller shadow@xxxxxx (03 Feb 2017 09:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Bruce Johnson (03 Feb 2017 17:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Timothy Collinson (03 Feb 2017 21:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Evyn MacDude (03 Feb 2017 07:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller tmr0195@xxxxxx (29 Jan 2017 18:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller Timothy Collinson (29 Jan 2017 09:01 UTC)

Re: [TML] Mongoose Traveller rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx 29 Jan 2017 22:44 UTC

On 29 Jan 2017 at 19:50, Timothy Collinson wrote:

> (I'm convinced we underestimate just how boring a week in Jump would
> really be.  Might there be a traditional "fifth night" in Jump, jump
> in of party pieces on most ships?

For crew it's probably no worse than being out of port a week on a ship (especially a
sub) today - yes, there's next to nothing outside, like weather, to occupy your mind, but
Traveller ships have pretty large living spaces compared to ships, so I imagine there's a
pretty good entertainment and exercise selection, especially on larger ships and ships
that take paying passengers.

Now passengers who aren't regular travellers probably get pretty bored, but on the
other hand they can tell themselves "it's only a couple more days".

If there is a 'jump party' (and I agree that something like this is likely), day five of jump
is the ideal day - late in the jump, but not so late that (misjumps aside) you risk leaving
jump with the booze half-finished and the crew lounge still covered in confetti and
chippie bags.