Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc.
Phil Pugliese
(25 Jan 2018 21:37 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc.
Catherine Berry
(25 Jan 2018 23:30 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc.
Bruce Johnson
(25 Jan 2018 23:34 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc.
Catherine Berry
(26 Jan 2018 00:05 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc.
Jerry Barrington
(27 Jan 2018 01:17 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc.
Kurt Feltenberger
(27 Jan 2018 01:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc.
Phil Pugliese
(26 Jan 2018 02:13 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc. Rupert Boleyn (26 Jan 2018 00:57 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc.
Phil Pugliese
(26 Jan 2018 02:20 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Meson Guns CT vs MT vs etc. Rupert Boleyn 26 Jan 2018 00:57 UTC
On 26Jan2018 1229, Catherine Berry wrote: > One thing that I recall being mentioned somewhere -- maybe on this list -- > is that one would imagine that, especially early on, the powers enforcing > the isolation of this system would concentrate heavily on making sure that > the robots didn't capture a working J-drive. Canon already tells us that > getting a working example allows for quick replication. It may be that the > robots would ignore such an opportunity; it may also be they'd be boiling > out into the galaxy on a crusade against everyone else a year later. Not > the sort of risk you want to take. Thus it's surprising to the point of > jaw-dropping that the Vilani were so willing to land ships there once they > figured out most of what was going on. I would assume that the 'ships' landed had no jump drives, and their parent vessels were in high orbit, out of meson gun range. -- Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com> Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief