Space Stations (Supplement 14) Timothy Collinson (24 Sep 2014 21:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Ian Whitchurch (24 Sep 2014 22:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Evyn MacDude (25 Sep 2014 00:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Timothy Collinson (25 Sep 2014 07:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Evyn MacDude (25 Sep 2014 00:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Timothy Collinson (25 Sep 2014 07:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Tim (25 Sep 2014 02:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Timothy Collinson (25 Sep 2014 18:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Timothy Collinson (25 Sep 2014 18:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Bruce Johnson (25 Sep 2014 19:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Phil Pugliese (25 Sep 2014 19:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Tim (30 Sep 2014 04:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Timothy Collinson (01 Oct 2014 19:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Bruce Johnson (01 Oct 2014 20:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Mikko Parviainen (02 Oct 2014 09:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Tim (02 Oct 2014 04:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Richard Aiken (02 Oct 2014 06:19 UTC)

Re: [TML] Space Stations (Supplement 14) Bruce Johnson 25 Sep 2014 19:53 UTC

On Sep 25, 2014, at 11:39 AM, Timothy Collinson <timothy.collinson@port.ac.uk> wrote:

> Oh, and while I'm here, for anyone who was interested, I worked out the 'crew'.  Remember it has a population of 6,000,000 (although I'm allowing for 8,000,000 as I assume a lot of transients).
>
> Command Staff: Station Chief, Computer Expert, Traffic Controller and 500,000 staff
> Engineering: 100,000 staff
> Service: 2,000,000 staff
> Facilities:
>    refinery 20
>    manufacturing 2500
>    construction 2000
>
> (This is with lots of automation)
>
> Can't help feeling those last two are a bit thin, but I'm probably thinking 21st century rather than lots of automation.)
>
> But I guess 2.6 million out of a population of 6 isn't actually too unreasonable although I was a bit shocked by the figures at first.

If the service staff include all the nonresidential employees and such (who may well commute to work from their orbiting hovels elsewhere) this is a reasonable number. Also the people living here are Downton Abbey types, isn’t staff for them something like 5 or 10:1 staff:resident? :-)

Otherwise what they heck are they all doing all day every day? That’s one service person for every 3 or 4 residents. Seems awfully high!

Just have to remember to NOT send off the phone sanitizers on Ark A...

--
Bruce Johnson
University of Arizona
College of Pharmacy
Information Technology Group

Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs