Kinetic Bombardment Help
Kurt Feltenberger
(28 Nov 2014 16:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
Tim
(29 Nov 2014 23:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
Ian Whitchurch
(29 Nov 2014 23:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
Kurt Feltenberger
(29 Nov 2014 23:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help Tim (30 Nov 2014 07:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
Grimmund
(01 Dec 2014 02:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
Kurt Feltenberger
(01 Dec 2014 03:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
Ian Whitchurch
(01 Dec 2014 05:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
Tim
(02 Dec 2014 04:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
shadow@xxxxxx
(02 Dec 2014 13:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help Tim 30 Nov 2014 07:48 UTC
On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 06:50:22PM -0500, Kurt Feltenberger wrote: > Thanks for the reply! Currently the dimensions aren't quite what you > have listed...the Mjolnir-A is 69.37m long by 7m in diameter, while > the Mjolnir-B is 38.6m long by 3.5m in diameter. Yes, those are fine and covered by "arbitrarily larger". So about 50 000 tonnes for Mjolnir-A and 7000 tonnes for Mjolnir-B if made from solid tungsten. > The goal is pretty much slag cities, mountains, Terrasques, and > other bits and bobs that might need smiting from orbit. Both of them would be comparable in minimum impact energy to nuclear detonations -- obviously with Mjollnir-A being comparable to larger weapons. The exact details would depend upon how fast they hit. - Tim