Kinetic Bombardment Help
Kurt Feltenberger
(28 Nov 2014 16:51 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
Tim
(29 Nov 2014 23:31 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
Ian Whitchurch
(29 Nov 2014 23:46 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
Kurt Feltenberger
(29 Nov 2014 23:50 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
Tim
(30 Nov 2014 07:48 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help Grimmund (01 Dec 2014 02:44 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
Kurt Feltenberger
(01 Dec 2014 03:25 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
Ian Whitchurch
(01 Dec 2014 05:14 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
Tim
(02 Dec 2014 04:11 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help
shadow@xxxxxx
(02 Dec 2014 13:07 UTC)
|
Re: [TML] Kinetic Bombardment Help Grimmund 01 Dec 2014 02:43 UTC
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Tim <xxxxxx@little-possums.net> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 06:50:22PM -0500, Kurt Feltenberger wrote: >> Thanks for the reply! Currently the dimensions aren't quite what you >> have listed...the Mjolnir-A is 69.37m long by 7m in diameter, while >> the Mjolnir-B is 38.6m long by 3.5m in diameter. > > Yes, those are fine and covered by "arbitrarily larger". So about > 50 000 tonnes for Mjolnir-A and 7000 tonnes for Mjolnir-B if made from > solid tungsten. That seems kinda damn expensive for slugs. Is there some particular reason to not use nuclear weapons at that size? Tim- Any significant difference for just using scrap iron? Maybe with a little DU or tungsten cap? Dan -- "Any sufficiently advanced parody is indistinguishable from a genuine kook." -Alan Morgan