INteresting model of our part of the universe Bruce Johnson (03 Feb 2017 18:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] INteresting model of our part of the universe Greg Nokes (03 Feb 2017 22:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] INteresting model of our part of the universe Bruce Johnson (04 Feb 2017 00:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] INteresting model of our part of the universe Chuck McKnight (04 Feb 2017 00:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] INteresting model of our part of the universe Bruce Johnson (04 Feb 2017 20:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] INteresting model of our part of the universe Tim (04 Feb 2017 01:07 UTC)

Re: [TML] INteresting model of our part of the universe Tim 04 Feb 2017 01:07 UTC

On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 04:25:26PM -0800, Chuck McKnight wrote:
> I think it’s pretty judgmental to term matterless vaccums
> “repulsive” and shows an inordinate bias towards matter-filled
> vacuums.

My apologies.  I can only offer my thoughtless self-centredness as
explanation, being a matter-filled entity myself.

- Tim