sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (24 Jun 2015 21:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 22:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (24 Jun 2015 22:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Tim (25 Jun 2015 04:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (25 Jun 2015 05:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) shadow@xxxxxx (25 Jun 2015 06:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (25 Jun 2015 07:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Tim (25 Jun 2015 07:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (25 Jun 2015 07:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Ethan McKinney (28 Jun 2015 02:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (30 Jun 2015 01:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (30 Jun 2015 12:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Evyn MacDude (30 Jun 2015 18:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (30 Jun 2015 18:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Evyn MacDude (30 Jun 2015 18:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Craig Berry (30 Jun 2015 19:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (01 Jul 2015 05:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Knapp (30 Jun 2015 19:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Richard Aiken (01 Jul 2015 05:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (01 Jul 2015 12:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Tim (01 Jul 2015 22:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (25 Jun 2015 12:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) shadow@xxxxxx (25 Jun 2015 06:58 UTC)

Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Tim 25 Jun 2015 04:50 UTC

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 04:30:14PM -0500, Grimmund wrote:
> A little light goes off on the sensor panel, says a ship (or
> several) has exited jump space, and gives an approximate range and
> bearing?

More likely a fairly precise range and an extremely precise bearing.
What's more, anything coming in from jump that isn't broadcasting
identity codes (with sensor data matching the ship's registration) is
definitely very suspect.

> Presumably, one of the main jobs of system traffic control is to be on
> the lookout for any ships breaking traffic control patterns.

Yes, especially given that even a small starship moving at typical
speeds achieved during transfer between 100D and orbit would hit with
the energy of a large nuclear weapon.  Traffic control near any
populated world will be taken *very* seriously.

- Tim