sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (24 Jun 2015 21:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 22:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (24 Jun 2015 22:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Tim (25 Jun 2015 04:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (25 Jun 2015 05:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) shadow@xxxxxx (25 Jun 2015 06:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (25 Jun 2015 07:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Tim (25 Jun 2015 07:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (25 Jun 2015 07:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Ethan McKinney (28 Jun 2015 02:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (30 Jun 2015 01:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (30 Jun 2015 12:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Evyn MacDude (30 Jun 2015 18:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (30 Jun 2015 18:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Evyn MacDude (30 Jun 2015 18:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Craig Berry (30 Jun 2015 19:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) William Ewing (01 Jul 2015 05:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Knapp (30 Jun 2015 19:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Richard Aiken (01 Jul 2015 05:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (01 Jul 2015 12:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Tim (01 Jul 2015 22:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund (25 Jun 2015 12:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) shadow@xxxxxx (25 Jun 2015 06:58 UTC)

Re: [TML] sensors and ops (was berthing) Grimmund 01 Jul 2015 12:47 UTC

On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:07 AM, Richard Aiken <raikenclw@gmail.com> wrote:
>> LIDAR:  Range and bearing, digital.
>
>
> I'm assuming the "LI" stands for "Light Imaging," then? E.g. you're using
> reflected star/sunlight off the target as your data source? If so, wouldn't
> a coat of flat black paint cut down on useful range?

 "Laser radar"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lidar

Does not have to be optical wavelengths; probably would not be, to
avoid that light trace back to the transmitter.

 Dan

--

"Any sufficiently advanced parody is indistinguishable from a genuine
kook." -Alan Morgan