Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (23 Jun 2015 21:16 UTC)
(missing)
(missing)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (25 Jun 2015 00:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (25 Jun 2015 02:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (25 Jun 2015 02:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 22:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (25 Jun 2015 00:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (25 Jun 2015 00:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 23:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 23:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question shadow@xxxxxx (25 Jun 2015 06:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Knapp (26 Jun 2015 09:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (27 Jun 2015 01:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question shadow@xxxxxx (27 Jun 2015 03:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (27 Jun 2015 07:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (27 Jun 2015 11:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Grimmund (27 Jun 2015 11:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (27 Jun 2015 19:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Kelly St. Clair (27 Jun 2015 20:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (27 Jun 2015 14:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question W. Hopper (27 Jun 2015 16:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Phil Pugliese (27 Jun 2015 16:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (27 Jun 2015 16:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (28 Jun 2015 07:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (27 Jun 2015 20:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 05:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 06:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 06:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 07:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Kelly St. Clair (24 Jun 2015 07:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 07:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Knapp (24 Jun 2015 20:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 07:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 07:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 07:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 08:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Grimmund (24 Jun 2015 13:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Jeffrey Schwartz (24 Jun 2015 15:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Grimmund (24 Jun 2015 16:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Jeffrey Schwartz (24 Jun 2015 16:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 16:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Craig Berry (24 Jun 2015 17:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 19:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (28 Jun 2015 07:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Grimmund (28 Jun 2015 12:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (28 Jun 2015 12:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (29 Jun 2015 06:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 07:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 08:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Kelly St. Clair (24 Jun 2015 09:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Kelly St. Clair (24 Jun 2015 09:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 11:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 20:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 09:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Richard Aiken (24 Jun 2015 11:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Greg Chalik (24 Jun 2015 19:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Another Question Jeffrey Schwartz (24 Jun 2015 12:32 UTC)

Re: [TML] Another Question shadow@xxxxxx 27 Jun 2015 03:44 UTC

On 27 Jun 2015 at 11:22, Greg Chalik wrote:

>
>
> On 25 June 2015 at 16:30, <xxxxxx@shadowgard.com > wrote:
>     On 25 Jun 2015 at 9:22, Greg Chalik wrote:
>
>     > In defence industry slang 'wired for' simply means the system has
>     > interfaces added for future integration of sub-systems and
>     components
>
>     YThis isn't the defense industry.
>
>     In *common* usage, "wired for" has a different meaning. And that's
>     what people read it as.
>
>  Leonard, please enlighten me where "wired for" is used in *common*
> usage outside defence industry.

Please tell me you are kidding. You can't *possibly* not known that.

*old* example "wired for sound" = has the required hardwaree
installed and ready to go. Depending on context could be describing
audio bugs, stereo equipment or other things.

Your usage was apparently "has connections for"

Usage I am (and apparently other folks on tne list are) used to is
"has the gear already installed & working"
--
Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
shadow at shadowgard dot com