Instant city Knapp (09 Feb 2016 16:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Jeffrey Schwartz (09 Feb 2016 16:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Kelly St. Clair (09 Feb 2016 16:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city carlos.web@xxxxxx (09 Feb 2016 16:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Knapp (09 Feb 2016 18:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (09 Feb 2016 19:15 UTC)
RE: [TML] Instant city Antony Farrell (10 Feb 2016 03:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Nokes (09 Feb 2016 17:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Peter L. Berghold (09 Feb 2016 16:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Kelly St. Clair (09 Feb 2016 17:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Kelly St. Clair (09 Feb 2016 17:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Peter L. Berghold (09 Feb 2016 18:13 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Doug Grimes (09 Feb 2016 19:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (09 Feb 2016 19:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Grimmund (09 Feb 2016 21:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Peter L. Berghold (09 Feb 2016 21:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Richard Aiken (11 Feb 2016 06:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (11 Feb 2016 07:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city William Ewing (11 Feb 2016 06:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Traveller (11 Feb 2016 13:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (11 Feb 2016 14:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Jeffrey Schwartz (11 Feb 2016 15:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Knapp (11 Feb 2016 15:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Knapp (11 Feb 2016 15:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Bruce Johnson (11 Feb 2016 18:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Jeffrey Schwartz (11 Feb 2016 18:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (11 Feb 2016 18:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Knapp (11 Feb 2016 18:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (11 Feb 2016 19:17 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (11 Feb 2016 20:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (11 Feb 2016 20:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (11 Feb 2016 20:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city shadow@xxxxxx (19 Feb 2016 06:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Bruce Johnson (11 Feb 2016 19:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (11 Feb 2016 18:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Bruce Johnson (11 Feb 2016 19:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Nokes (11 Feb 2016 19:41 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Bruce Johnson (11 Feb 2016 19:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (11 Feb 2016 18:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (11 Feb 2016 20:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Bruce Johnson (11 Feb 2016 21:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (11 Feb 2016 21:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (11 Feb 2016 22:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (12 Feb 2016 00:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (12 Feb 2016 00:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (12 Feb 2016 01:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (12 Feb 2016 07:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (12 Feb 2016 08:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (12 Feb 2016 09:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (12 Feb 2016 10:20 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Knapp (12 Feb 2016 10:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Knapp (12 Feb 2016 11:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (12 Feb 2016 20:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Knapp (14 Feb 2016 18:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (12 Feb 2016 15:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (12 Feb 2016 16:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (12 Feb 2016 17:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (12 Feb 2016 17:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (12 Feb 2016 14:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Jeffrey Schwartz (12 Feb 2016 15:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (12 Feb 2016 15:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Jeffrey Schwartz (12 Feb 2016 17:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (12 Feb 2016 18:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (12 Feb 2016 20:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (12 Feb 2016 21:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city William Ewing (13 Feb 2016 01:53 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (13 Feb 2016 01:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Richard Aiken (13 Feb 2016 02:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city William Ewing (14 Feb 2016 06:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (14 Feb 2016 06:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city William Ewing (14 Feb 2016 06:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city shadow@xxxxxx (19 Feb 2016 22:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (12 Feb 2016 20:46 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (12 Feb 2016 20:57 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (12 Feb 2016 21:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Grimmund (12 Feb 2016 21:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Bruce Johnson (12 Feb 2016 21:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (12 Feb 2016 22:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (13 Feb 2016 02:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (12 Feb 2016 21:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (12 Feb 2016 22:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city William Ewing (13 Feb 2016 01:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (13 Feb 2016 01:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Bruce Johnson (13 Feb 2016 02:07 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Richard Aiken (13 Feb 2016 02:18 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Richard Aiken (13 Feb 2016 02:21 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (13 Feb 2016 02:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Richard Aiken (13 Feb 2016 03:31 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Timothy Collinson (13 Feb 2016 07:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city shadow@xxxxxx (19 Feb 2016 07:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (13 Feb 2016 03:22 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city William Ewing (14 Feb 2016 06:26 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (14 Feb 2016 06:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city William Ewing (14 Feb 2016 07:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (14 Feb 2016 19:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Richard Aiken (15 Feb 2016 00:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (15 Feb 2016 03:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (15 Feb 2016 03:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (15 Feb 2016 04:40 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city William Ewing (15 Feb 2016 09:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (15 Feb 2016 03:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (15 Feb 2016 03:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (15 Feb 2016 04:06 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (15 Feb 2016 04:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (15 Feb 2016 04:54 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (15 Feb 2016 05:14 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Knapp (15 Feb 2016 11:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city shadow@xxxxxx (19 Feb 2016 22:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Jeffrey Schwartz (12 Feb 2016 15:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (12 Feb 2016 15:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Timothy Collinson (12 Feb 2016 04:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (12 Feb 2016 07:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Richard Aiken (12 Feb 2016 07:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (12 Feb 2016 07:47 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Craig Berry (12 Feb 2016 14:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Bruce Johnson (12 Feb 2016 20:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (12 Feb 2016 21:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Richard Aiken (13 Feb 2016 01:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Richard Aiken (13 Feb 2016 01:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (13 Feb 2016 03:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Timothy Collinson (12 Feb 2016 09:25 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (12 Feb 2016 10:19 UTC)
Re[2]: [TML] Instant city Timothy Collinson (12 Feb 2016 20:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Grimmund (12 Feb 2016 15:58 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (11 Feb 2016 16:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Jeffrey Schwartz (11 Feb 2016 16:29 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (11 Feb 2016 20:15 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Jeffrey Schwartz (11 Feb 2016 20:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city tmr0195@xxxxxx (11 Feb 2016 21:40 UTC)
Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Bruce Johnson (11 Feb 2016 21:16 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) tmr0195@xxxxxx (11 Feb 2016 22:00 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Bruce Johnson (11 Feb 2016 22:46 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Kelly St. Clair (12 Feb 2016 01:44 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Richard Aiken (12 Feb 2016 05:01 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Craig Berry (12 Feb 2016 17:41 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Richard Aiken (13 Feb 2016 03:01 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) tmr0195@xxxxxx (12 Feb 2016 06:36 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Ethan McKinney (11 Feb 2016 22:58 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) tmr0195@xxxxxx (12 Feb 2016 06:40 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Jeffrey Schwartz (12 Feb 2016 15:22 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) tmr0195@xxxxxx (12 Feb 2016 15:55 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Kelly St. Clair (12 Feb 2016 17:36 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) tmr0195@xxxxxx (12 Feb 2016 18:19 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Craig Berry (12 Feb 2016 19:15 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Andrew Long (12 Feb 2016 22:42 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx (13 Feb 2016 01:19 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Craig Berry (13 Feb 2016 01:56 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) tmr0195@xxxxxx (13 Feb 2016 03:17 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Richard Aiken (13 Feb 2016 03:17 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) tmr0195@xxxxxx (13 Feb 2016 03:37 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx (13 Feb 2016 07:18 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Greg Nokes (16 Feb 2016 02:07 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Richard Aiken (16 Feb 2016 23:11 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Craig Berry (16 Feb 2016 23:35 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Richard Aiken (16 Feb 2016 23:59 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Craig Berry (17 Feb 2016 00:06 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Richard Aiken (17 Feb 2016 00:39 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Craig Berry (17 Feb 2016 00:51 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Richard Aiken (17 Feb 2016 03:25 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Bruce Johnson (17 Feb 2016 03:25 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Richard Aiken (17 Feb 2016 03:33 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) shadow@xxxxxx (21 Feb 2016 00:23 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Bruce Johnson (12 Feb 2016 21:11 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Jeffrey Schwartz (15 Feb 2016 14:04 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) Richard Aiken (15 Feb 2016 17:15 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) rupert.boleyn@xxxxxx (15 Feb 2016 21:07 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) shadow@xxxxxx (21 Feb 2016 00:23 UTC)
Re: Jump Fuel (was Re: [TML] Instant city) shadow@xxxxxx (21 Feb 2016 00:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (13 Feb 2016 10:10 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Knapp (14 Feb 2016 20:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (14 Feb 2016 20:39 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Knapp (14 Feb 2016 20:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Greg Chalik (14 Feb 2016 21:23 UTC)
Re: [TML] Instant city Tim (15 Feb 2016 01:03 UTC)
Modelling Traveller Ships in Blender. (Was Re: [TML] Instant city) Peter L. Berghold (14 Feb 2016 20:55 UTC)

Re: [TML] Instant city Tim 15 Feb 2016 01:03 UTC

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 09:45:04PM +0100, Knapp wrote:
> Are there any engineers here that can say one way or the other what
> would happen if you set a Tigress down lightly on the Earth, say
> even in a small lake or other structure that might support it a
> little bit?

The overall structure should be perfectly fine.  It is designed to
support internal stresses from its manuevering thrusters up to 6g, and
has decent enough agility that it must have a lot of lateral bracing
as well.

The mass of the armour is a decent fraction of the mass of the whole
ship, so it must be very strongly braced just to remain intact under
such maneuvers.  One should expect at least a factor of 3 in design
stress vs expected conditions, so it should be capable of supporting
its own mass under something like 18 gee accelerations.

However, the entire weight of the ship acting through a small portion
of the area would probably be enough to crumple that area.  The
question is whether the ground would squish first - and a quick BotE
check suggests that many surfaces would.  Certainly most types of
structures on the hull in the contact area would be crushed, and there
may be some localized deformation and damage in the bottom percent or
two of the ship's volume.

Landing in an alluvial plain or other area with a fairly thick layer
of relatively soft ground would probably result in the ship sinking a
few metres -- until the contact area was sufficient to reduce the
ground pressure.  The contact area at that time would be on the order
of 50 metres aross.  Over subsequent years the ship would slowly
subside further, probably up to about 20-30 metres unless prevented by
reaching more solid rock.

If the ship was in condition to do densitometry scans, it could
probably find a suitable site to reduce damage while preventing too
much subsidence.

Landing on a hard rock surface (or a place with hard rock just a metre
or two below the surface) would be a worse proposition.  Unless the
hull were *very* much stiffer than necessary for ordinary operation,
the lower few metres would definitely crumple making the lowest few
percent of the ship unusable, and with some deformations extending
higher.  Still, the vast majority of the ship would remain intact.

- Tim