Salvage Operations Knapp (20 Feb 2016 11:27 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Richard Aiken (20 Feb 2016 11:43 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Richard Aiken (20 Feb 2016 11:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Knapp (20 Feb 2016 13:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations shadow@xxxxxx (21 Feb 2016 05:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Tim (21 Feb 2016 00:30 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Richard Aiken (21 Feb 2016 03:28 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations shadow@xxxxxx (21 Feb 2016 05:32 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Bruce Johnson (21 Feb 2016 20:50 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Craig Berry (21 Feb 2016 20:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Knapp (21 Feb 2016 22:02 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Craig Berry (21 Feb 2016 22:09 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Knapp (21 Feb 2016 22:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Tim (22 Feb 2016 05:11 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Knapp (22 Feb 2016 12:36 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines) carlos.web@xxxxxx (22 Feb 2016 20:34 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines) Richard Aiken (22 Feb 2016 22:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines) tmr0195@xxxxxx (22 Feb 2016 22:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines) Richard Aiken (22 Feb 2016 22:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines) Greg Chalik (23 Feb 2016 08:45 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines) Bruce Johnson (23 Feb 2016 18:00 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations (and Submarines) Greg Chalik (23 Feb 2016 20:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Richard Aiken (22 Feb 2016 21:55 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Craig Berry (22 Feb 2016 22:03 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Bruce Johnson (22 Feb 2016 22:04 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Richard Aiken (22 Feb 2016 22:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations tmr0195@xxxxxx (22 Feb 2016 22:19 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Richard Aiken (22 Feb 2016 23:16 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Greg Chalik (23 Feb 2016 08:24 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Craig Berry (24 Feb 2016 17:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Tim (22 Feb 2016 23:33 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Greg Chalik (23 Feb 2016 08:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Tim (23 Feb 2016 09:52 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Greg Chalik (23 Feb 2016 09:56 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Richard Aiken (24 Feb 2016 08:12 UTC)
Re: [TML] Salvage Operations Tim (22 Feb 2016 05:15 UTC)

Re: [TML] Salvage Operations shadow@xxxxxx 21 Feb 2016 05:32 UTC

On 20 Feb 2016 at 12:27, Knapp wrote:

> I got to thinking that if you want to run a misjump salvage operation
> you should go to where the ships are jumping a lot and then around
> this area set up a bunch of satellites that watch for jump flashes in
> the wrong place, like deep space. Once you get a couple of flashes
> from 3 points then you can triangulate where the ship landed. You
> know that the flash is at least a couple of hundred years old, light
> speed, so it should be people free.

Except it's going to be *really* hard to see a jump flash from
several sectors away (as that "several hundred years" bit would
require).

> So a normal day is jumping from satellite to satellite collecting the
> data and hoping for a hit. Naturally one points flash would be much
> latter than the next points flash data if the point is not between
> the two points but over time you should get hits. A bit like looking
> for sunken ships in hopes of finding the gold. You could also amass
> all the lost ship reports from the last 1000 years or so.

Given that jumps take a week, that wouldn't be a "normal day". It'd
be a several months.

Also, again with the "several hundred years" bit, you'd need
observations from several parsecs apart to triangulate properly.
--
Leonard Erickson (aka shadow)
shadow at shadowgard dot com