Re: [TML]Pong George Herbert (15 Mar 2016 00:35 UTC)
Re: [TML]Pong Mark Urbin (15 Mar 2016 18:46 UTC)
Re: [TML]Pong Jeffrey Schwartz (15 Mar 2016 19:05 UTC)
Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Greg Nokes (15 Mar 2016 19:57 UTC)
Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Bruce Johnson (15 Mar 2016 20:11 UTC)
Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Grimmund (16 Mar 2016 02:36 UTC)
Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Richard Aiken (25 Mar 2016 00:14 UTC)
Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Jeffrey Schwartz (15 Mar 2016 20:12 UTC)
Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Bruce Johnson (15 Mar 2016 20:31 UTC)
Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Richard Aiken (25 Mar 2016 00:20 UTC)
Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Jeffrey Schwartz (25 Mar 2016 13:21 UTC)
Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Ethan McKinney (24 Mar 2016 22:54 UTC)
Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Grimmund (25 Mar 2016 14:43 UTC)
Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Greg Nokes (25 Mar 2016 20:05 UTC)
Re: Advanced Missile Concepts [WAS: Re: [TML]Pong] Richard Aiken (26 Mar 2016 03:39 UTC)
Re: [TML]Pong Richard Aiken (16 Mar 2016 04:47 UTC)

Re: [TML]Pong Jeffrey Schwartz 15 Mar 2016 19:04 UTC

Take with a very large bag of salt...

http://www.pravdareport.com/science/tech/19-11-2014/129079-atomic_bullets-0/

The decay heat makes sense, but the half life issue isn't even mentioned.

100 to 700kg of TNT per bullet is quite a bit, but not total Armageddon.

 Presuming this kind of thing is possible with Traveller tech levels
though, I think it would be a nice half-way on the "kinetic vs nuclear
missile" discussion in another thread.
Load up a MetalStorm style mechanism with these, put the whole thing
in a nuclear dampner box, and when it closes on the armored target,
begin firing a steady stream of Cf bullets. As they hit the target
ship, they'll carve a path inward for the shipkiller warhead still in
the missile.
Say a 10x10 array of barrels, with 10 bullets per barrel. That'd give
around 0.5 kilotons of "carving" potential. Figure maybe 25% actually
hit usefully, and that's still 0.1kt of carving.

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Mark Urbin <xxxxxx@urbin.net> wrote:
> I can still think of several PCs in games I've run who would want one.   One
> of my favorite lines from the Ringworld books comes to mind for the more
> sane (for various ratings of sane) PCs that would carry a 25mm handgun with
> a Cf round.  This isn't an exact quote, but close "The problem with having a
> anti-matter missile, is that the crew looked for the first excuse to get rid
> of it."
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:35 PM, George Herbert <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> The current consensus is that tiny Cf micronukes will be more like 20-25mm
>> projectiles but might well work.  The ones that small would be horribly
>> dangerously radioactive to have around and would decay rapidly barring
>> convenient damper tech like Traveller supposes...
>>
>> George William Herbert
>> Sent from my iPhone-----
>> The Traveller Mailing List
>> Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
>> Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
>> To unsubscribe from this list please goto
>> http://archives.simplelists.com
>
>
>
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.urbin.net/
> Projectile ejection of sparkling effusion designed to
> quench thirst through nasal orifices bodes ill for finish
> of cyberspace interface device.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> -----
> The Traveller Mailing List
> Archives at http://archives.simplelists.com/tml
> Report problems to xxxxxx@simplelists.com
> To unsubscribe from this list please goto
> http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=vSy3NFQJMSbZKrzPfC3XucFBsUCMtKrI