Odd Tech questions. Evyn MacDude (28 Sep 2017 02:08 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. Cole (28 Sep 2017 02:49 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. Kelly St. Clair (28 Sep 2017 02:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. Kelly St. Clair (28 Sep 2017 03:05 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. Rupert Boleyn (28 Sep 2017 06:01 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. Rupert Boleyn (28 Sep 2017 04:59 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. Evyn MacDude (28 Sep 2017 07:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. Tim (28 Sep 2017 03:51 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. Amber Witherspoon (28 Sep 2017 04:48 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. Evyn MacDude (28 Sep 2017 07:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. Jerry Barrington (28 Sep 2017 13:37 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. C. Berry (28 Sep 2017 18:35 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. Kelly St. Clair (28 Sep 2017 18:38 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. C. Berry (28 Sep 2017 18:42 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. shadow@xxxxxx (29 Sep 2017 20:44 UTC)
Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. Amber Witherspoon (29 Sep 2017 22:06 UTC)

Re: [TML] Odd Tech questions. Rupert Boleyn 28 Sep 2017 04:59 UTC

On 28Sep2017 1559, Kelly St. Clair wrote:

> Well, consider that in the real world, strong radars and transmitters -
> the kind mounted on ships and surface installations - can't really be
> /stopped/ from doing this, at least at close range.  A comm laser is
> just a collimated version, operating at a different range of wavelengths
> (maybe).

Even fairly small navigation radars, of the sort mounted on small
pleasure boats, can cause eye damage if you work near them when they're
turned on (microwaved eyeballs, ummmm....).

--
Rupert Boleyn <xxxxxx@gmail.com>
Chief Assistant to the Assistant Chief